I must admit to having split personalities. I am drawn to guns with high gloss blue and figured walnut one minute, and black matte industrial tools with phosphate and polymer and matte finishes the next. This idea is very evident if you look at the shotguns that I have owned. The fanciest was probably a Grade V Browning Citori in 20 gauge that I never should have let go, and the crudest was, ironically, a double barrel over-under, too, albeit a Brazilian double with a stock that I swear was carved from a 2×4. I have owned a silver receiver Beretta 391 lightweight with gorgeous wood, a Browning Gold Stalker with black matte everything, and many in between. For waterfowl, however, I have never managed to hang onto anything because (startling confession begins here) I don’t do that much waterfowling. Any really nice duck guns I have ever had have been traded off for things I would use much more often.

Benelli 20 ga. Nova and Remington 12 ga 887
What I have ended up with is a 2o gauge Benelli Nova (black on black) and a Remington 887 12 gauge (black on black on black–hey, it even has plastic over-molded on the barrel). Both are very similar and are cut from the same cloth–inexpensive, and made to smash against the boat, get dirty, and cycle hundreds of rounds without complaining.
In looking back on the history of waterfowl guns, I couldn’t help but think about a pair of Winchester Model 12s I know. Both are family guns, so were easily accessible to compare to their modern counterparts. One is a 12 gauge belonging to one of my in-laws and one is a 16 gauge that I inherited from my great uncle who shared my love of jump-shooting ducks and fly-fishing. The Model 12 was definitely the equivalent of the Nova or 887 in its day. Very practical, and it’s not surprising that most of the Model 12s one sees are beat to heck. My 16 ga. was definitely used, but not abused. Most of the finish is gone from being carried afield hundreds of times, but there is not a single drop of rust. The bore to this day is mirror-bright.

16 and 12 ga Winchester Model 12s
Of course, if one were to really cover the history of pump guns, one should mention the Remington 870, probably one of the best (and most boring) pump-action shotguns ever. The best ones were in found in days past, with the current crop of Expresses being as interesting as a piece of gravel, and finished to match. The Ithaca 37 and Browning BPS were much better (and a little bit nicer, being bottom-eject, in my opinion). The are also generally finished much nicer.
But this article is about plastic guns, and not the kind that shoot water. Unlike the old Model 12s in the family, the Nova and 887 will probably hold up to the wear and tear a little bit better, allowing things to bounce a bit off the plastic parts, instead of leaving gouges in walnut. The recoil pads are certainly better than the plastic buttplate of my 16 or the hard rubber on the 12 gauge Model 12.

Remington SuperCell recoil pad on 887 12 ga.
Let’s take a look at the similarities and differences of the two polymer quacker-blasters:

Benelli Nova polymer receiver
Outwardly, both guns have a matte black finish and a polymer receiver outer shell, combined with composite stocks that have molded-in grip areas on both the pistol grip and the forend. Each gun has a mid-bead on its vented rib, and there is a rubber recoil pad. Remington wins the battle of the pads with its superb SuperCell pad, a welcome addition on a 3 1/2″ 12 gauge. Honestly, on the Benelli, which is a 20 ga, the pad is not an issue for me, but I assume they use a similar pad on the 12 gauge model. I have also heard many reports that the Nova in 12 gauge form is a pretty hard kicker, so I think if my chamberings and guns were reversed, I would have to invest in Benelli’s recoil reducer or at the very least a Limbsaver recoil pad.

Remington 887 receiver
An area where the guns diverge is in their barrels. The Remington comes with one choke, a modified tube, while the Benelli comes with the standard three-choke assortment of Modified, Improved, and Full. The guns also diverge in their treatment of the outer barrel finish. The Remington 887 barrel is over-molded with plastic in a method that Remington terms Armor-Lokt. The Benelli is more traditional steel on both the inside and outside with a durable matte-black finish.

Benelli Nova barrel

Remington 887 barrel
Other areas where the guns diverge is in the placement of the slide release and safety. The Remington places the slide release on the front of the trigger guard, with a crossbolt safety behind the trigger. The Benelli, on the other hand, places the slide release and the safety both in front of the trigger. One annoying thing about the Remington is that the forend is so large and has so much plastic protruding to the rear, that it is possible to pinch a hand between the forend at its rear-most position and the trigger guard. I will have to use mine for long enough to see if I get used to it or if I have to remove some material from the rear of the forend.
Spring will have to arrive for me to test both guns against one another, as I have not yet fired the Remington. Reports around the Internet are mixed, with some saying that the Remington has less recoil than most 3 1/2″ 12 gauges. The recoil pad is certainly a good start. My initial impressions comparing the two guns are that the Benelli seems to have a smoother action and more stylish features, while the Remington has the look of a brute, even though it swings and shoulders well. The thickness of the barrel with its plastic shroud may be deceiving.
For a guy who once laughed at Glocks and their “Tupperware” containers, I have come a long way. I own a striker-fired polymer 9mm pistol (Ruger SR-9) and my duck-blasters look like they can be hosed off. But then I redeem myself by pheasant hunting with an Ithaca SKB side-by-side with some nice walnut (that has dings in it). They say variety is the spice of life, and I think those of us who really like guns shouldn’t limit ourselves to one finish and stock material.