I don’t get it! But I don’t always get some things either. I just finished reading an opinion piece written by a regular columnist who says he is a hunter. I’m not going to link you over to his column simply because I think it’s time to begin moving on. What I don’t get is this. How can a person publicly say that “assault weapons” or “military style weapons”, use all the negative anti-gun descriptions you want, should be banned because they are of no use and then in the next paragraph make this statement?
as a matter of disclosure, I do not support an assault rifle ban, because I think banning guns does nothing to solve the underlying problems that create crime
Tom Remington
