The other day I posted an article about the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources placing a limitation on where people can get firewood to bring onto lands controlled by the DNR. The press release I was sent by MDNR contained little information about the whys and wherefores of the new law. I made some of my own assumptions but left it up to readers to leave comments on why this law was being enacted.

The general consensus is to stop the spread of invasive bugs that can destroy vegetation. This is how it was explained to me by Gary Inman, who is a wildlife biologist along with his wife, Lesley.

Tom;
The firewood issue on forest campgrounds is not just happening in Minnesota. It is being considered in many other areas, including ours (meaning his state of Maine). It seems that the new forest pests that are now defoliating and killing many of our native forest trees are being transported by well meaning campers. They stop here tonight, then maybe four of five hundred miles away tomorrow night. If the fire wood is not used at each stop it may reach Alaska in a couple of weeks. Seems simple, but carries a big economic problem if the invasive insects get a foothold.

Gary

And it seems that Gary is quite correct when comparing the comments left by other readers. Jack Ryan from Indiana says:

It’s probably an attempt to contol the spread of invasive pests such as we are attempting here in Indiana with the emerald ash bore. Many insect pest hitch a ride in fire wood.

Scott in Wisconsin says the same thing is going to happen there.

Jack Ryan is correct. The Wisc. DNR will have the same restrictions soon. We would like to keep our ash trees as long as possible.

And Kristine Shreve from the Gunslinger, says they got something like this going on in UP Michigan.

We have something similar in the UP of Michigan. The pest is called, I believe, the Emerald Ash Borer. You’re not allowed to bring wood from the Lower Peninsula into the UP because they’re trying to keep the Borers from teh Upper Peninsula.

I’m guessing this is something like that.

So thank you to everyone who took the time to share experiences. But now I have a couple of questions that I think need to be answered and I certainly don’t have the answers, only suggestions.

The first question that comes to mind is how do you enforce such a law? I could see in areas where a gate has to be entered to get onto these lands, an inspection could take place. Otherwise how else could it really be enforced? I’ll agree that at least at this point in time any lessening of the transport of an invasive insect would be helpful. Is there a better way? Can someone explain this to me?

Which all this leads to my second question. Isn’t education perhaps the most effective way to do this? And if it is, why didn’t the DNR include an information portion with the press release that would have explained to me and thusly to all the readers that this is a problem and what we need to do to stop it?

My next mission will be to contact at least the MDNR and ask them to do such a thing and explain why.

Tom Remington

Related Posts