Yesterday when I wrote that the U.S. Supreme Court had agreed to hear the Washington, D.C. gun ban case, I warned readers to hang on to their hats.
So, here we go. Buckle up your seatbelt and put on another layer of thick skin and prepare to do your homework. Over the next 6 or 7 months, you will hear just about every lie a human could conjure up either for or against the Second Amendment.
Less than 24 hours later, the newspapers are teeming with editorials, opinions and down right angry writers blaming everyone for what might come. Here is an example I found today in the Baltimore Sun from Kenneth Lasson, a law professor at the University of Baltimore, who specializes in civil liberties.
Judge Silberman, Justices Scalia and Thomas and others have been spurred by the recent revisionist writings of several big-name law professors, whose scattershot scholarship can be fashioned to fit almost any favored thesis. But the blunderbuss proliferation of newly minted gun-rights advocacy perverts both the historical context and plain meaning of the Second Amendment.
If that got a little blood working through your veins, click here and read the rest.
It’s particularly interesting when a writer attempts to chastise those for doing what he has done to get his point across.
Tom Remington
Related Posts
- Second Amendment “Ambiguous And Mealy-Mouthed”
- Finally, U.S. Supreme Court Says 2nd Amendment Constitutional And Individual
- District Of Columbia Vs. Heller, At Last An Interpretation of Second Amendment
- Why Do We Need The Fourteenth Amendment To Reinforce The Bill Of Rights?
- Obama Opposes First Amendment And Second Amendment
