<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wyoming Senator Has Few Choice Words For Fellow Congressmen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2008/01/17/wyoming-senator-has-few-choice-words-for-fellow-congressmen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2008/01/17/wyoming-senator-has-few-choice-words-for-fellow-congressmen/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=wyoming-senator-has-few-choice-words-for-fellow-congressmen</link>
	<description>Black Bear Blog - The Politics of Hunting, Fishing and the Outdoors. Protecting our American Heritage.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2008/01/17/wyoming-senator-has-few-choice-words-for-fellow-congressmen/#comment-6921</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2008/01/17/wyoming-senator-has-few-choice-words-for-fellow-congressmen/#comment-6921</guid>
		<description>Wolves feeding on deer, elk, and other wildlife do not constitute a problem.  If there are not enough excess deer, elk, etc. to allow hunting at previous levels, so be it.  You do not a have a fundamental right to hunt these animals.  Hunting a privilege that can only be enjoyed when there is a sufficient population.  Simply because wolves feed on game animals does not make them a problem.  

If they are killing livestock than by all means protect your cows, sheep, whatever.  Maybe the wolf should be delisted, maybe it shouldn&#039;t.  However, the impact on hunting has absolutely nothing to do with what the wolf&#039;s status should be.  Mr. Barrasso is simply pandering to his base.  If killing wildlife constitutes a problem, then I assume Mr. Barrasso doen&#039;t support hunting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wolves feeding on deer, elk, and other wildlife do not constitute a problem.  If there are not enough excess deer, elk, etc. to allow hunting at previous levels, so be it.  You do not a have a fundamental right to hunt these animals.  Hunting a privilege that can only be enjoyed when there is a sufficient population.  Simply because wolves feed on game animals does not make them a problem.  </p>
<p>If they are killing livestock than by all means protect your cows, sheep, whatever.  Maybe the wolf should be delisted, maybe it shouldn&#8217;t.  However, the impact on hunting has absolutely nothing to do with what the wolf&#8217;s status should be.  Mr. Barrasso is simply pandering to his base.  If killing wildlife constitutes a problem, then I assume Mr. Barrasso doen&#8217;t support hunting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

