http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2008/03/18/district-of-columbia-vs-heller/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=district-of-columbia-vs-heller Black Bear Blog - The Politics of Hunting, Fishing and the Outdoors. Protecting our American Heritage. Fri, 25 May 2012 15:23:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2008/03/18/district-of-columbia-vs-heller/#comment-8209 ar Wed, 26 Mar 2008 06:44:32 +0000 http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2008/03/18/district-of-columbia-vs-heller/#comment-8209 I just gave you wrong info for: "Police launch gun program". Go to http://www.ushuntingtoday.com/news/ It's in the NRA News link. I just gave you wrong info for: “Police launch gun program”. Go to http://www.ushuntingtoday.com/news/ It’s in the NRA News link.

]]> http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2008/03/18/district-of-columbia-vs-heller/#comment-8208 ar Wed, 26 Mar 2008 06:11:20 +0000 http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2008/03/18/district-of-columbia-vs-heller/#comment-8208 Police launch gun program!? They launched every gun right into their carry-out cases just as quick as people handed them over. Un-real. Offering amnesty for turning your kids'guns over to police. AT THE FRONT DOOR. www.washingtontimes.com march 25, 2008. Police launch gun program!? They launched every gun right into their carry-out cases just as quick as people handed them over. Un-real. Offering amnesty for turning your kids’guns over to police. AT THE FRONT DOOR.
http://www.washingtontimes.com march 25, 2008.

]]> http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2008/03/18/district-of-columbia-vs-heller/#comment-8207 Tom Remington Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:41:10 +0000 http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2008/03/18/district-of-columbia-vs-heller/#comment-8207 AR - I believe you are correct! AR – I believe you are correct!

]]> http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2008/03/18/district-of-columbia-vs-heller/#comment-8206 ar Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:39:19 +0000 http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2008/03/18/district-of-columbia-vs-heller/#comment-8206 "The" right is to ensure protection from government alone. To make sure the people will have final say. So government cannot take away our right. The right of a free people.....to govern themselves. The Declaration of Independence was written mostly to insure that nothing like what happened in Britain, happened here. "The" right. Never negotiated. Cannot be taken away. Yours, forever. “The” right is to ensure protection from government alone. To make sure the people will have final say. So government cannot take away our right. The right of a free people…..to govern themselves. The Declaration of Independence was written mostly to insure that nothing like what happened in Britain, happened here. “The” right. Never negotiated. Cannot be taken away. Yours, forever.

]]> http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2008/03/18/district-of-columbia-vs-heller/#comment-8205 Tom Remington Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:06:21 +0000 http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2008/03/18/district-of-columbia-vs-heller/#comment-8205 AR - Not really! We are Americans, therefore we cannot accept anything in its simplest form. In the discussion during oral arguments, they did talk of "a" right versus "the" right. I thought it was good that someone (Ginsburg?) brought up that the First Amendment was written and described as "the" right. AR – Not really! We are Americans, therefore we cannot accept anything in its simplest form. In the discussion during oral arguments, they did talk of “a” right versus “the” right. I thought it was good that someone (Ginsburg?) brought up that the First Amendment was written and described as “the” right.

]]> http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2008/03/18/district-of-columbia-vs-heller/#comment-8204 ar Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:16:19 +0000 http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2008/03/18/district-of-columbia-vs-heller/#comment-8204 Am I wrong in thinking "the" right to keep and bear arms, not "a" right to keep and bear arms, is really three-fold? One: for the individual to use for a malitia. Two: for the individuals' use for protection. Three: for the protection from a government working against this right.? Am I wrong in thinking “the” right to keep and bear arms, not “a” right to keep and bear arms, is really three-fold? One: for the individual to use for a malitia. Two: for the individuals’ use for protection. Three: for the protection from a government working against this right.?

]]>