These days it seems most of my thoughts are random. So much going on in the world and with this age of instant communication, people want to know…….right now! As a reader, do you simply read from one, two or three sources and accept what you have read as fact? Do you look into things that interest you to learn more or verify it’s authenticity? Most don’t!

I do both but more times than not I come away with more questions than I had before I began reading anything. I suppose this is good, at least for me, as it tells me I’m not totally convinced that what I read is the gospel.

Here’s a question for you. We as humans develop thoughts and ideas from a very early age. As we grow, oftentimes our thoughts, ideas and ideals change too. Are you the same today as your were when you were say 15? Many have said that when we reach adulthood, we should have become who we are going to be. I guess from that they mean that our ideals and beliefs are pretty much etched in stone. If this is true, what is that magical age in which we can no longer change? Or can we change?

Examine yourself for a moment. Using your current age, do you still adjust your thoughts and beliefs according to what you learn on a daily basis, providing of course you are still learning?

It appears an evil sin as a politician that you change your mind about something. Today that is called flip-flopping. Yes, we see flip-flopping a lot by candidates in order to pander for votes but I’m talking mostly about real change. Is this bad or good? Does this mean you are an indecisive, wishy-washy person too fickle to lead or does it mean you are willing to adjust your thinking with more knowledge?

~~~~~~~~~

If Michael Phelps doesn’t win 8 gold medals in the Beijing Olympics, will he be a failure?

Why did Meredith Viera on the Today Show, in talking with the women’s gymnastics team, focus on how the girls felt about losing?

What is the real age of the “children” representing China in women’s gymnastics?

Will the Tampa Bay Rays win the AL pennant? Does anybody really care?

~~~~~~~

What does it say about our society now that the National Inquirer magazine is considered a legitimate and respected media source for breaking the John Edwards scandalous affair? Everyday, the New York Times seems to shrink in readership and the National Inquirer goes up. Hmmmmmmm?

~~~~~~~

I heard that the head of the FCC is saying that next year a new and different version of the “Fairness Doctrine” will be introduced. For those who don’t know, the Fairness Doctrine began and then was overturned, to guarantee that in talk radio anybody who expressed a thought had to give equal time to someone with an opposing view.

This new and improved act won’t be called the Fairness Doctrine but will more than likely be hidden in some sheep’s wool and disguised as something like “The Freedom of Speech Act” or some such foolishness.

For those who may also not be aware, the FCC guy said the new “Fairness Doctrine” will extend to the Internet, to get rid of guys like me and the millions of other people in this country wanting to share their thoughts and ideas.

If such a law should pass and I would be required to present opposing views, there would be hell to pay and I hope that millions of other Americans will stand up and say they aren’t going to take it anymore. Most will just say, “Oh, that won’t happen here.”

~~~~~~~

Is the Tenth Amendment dead? Is it now null and void because the states have been bought off with federal money? If, as some say, once any state accepts federal money, they give up their rights and powers to the federal government, then do people on welfare and/or receiving any kind of federal assistance also give up their rights? Does anyone know what the Tenth Amendment is?

~~~~~~~

And the final question of the day: Is it closer to New York or by car?

Tom Remington

Related Posts