We all scoff at flip-flopping and even those who flip-flop but we all should agree that when a person changes their mind about an issue once they are presented with evidence of fact, it has to be respected.

Someone asked not that long ago how many bear/human incidents in New Jersey would it take before people would smarten up and realize the couple of times in recent history when the state had a bear hunt, it actually did something to reduce those incidents while having a minimal impact on the overall population and health of the bears.

Further evidence of the “change of heart” is indicated in an editorial today in the New Jersey Daily Record.

We were originally opposed to a bear hunt, but now that we have not had one for three years, we can’t be blind to a noticeable increase in bear-human encounters. That includes 55 reports of bears breaking into homes through August. The Corzine administration is steadfast against a hunt. We understand its position, but as bear incidents rise, a hunt needs to be re-examined.

There is some light at the end of the tunnel it appears. For those wondering how much worse this is going to get, pick up your phones, email, write letters, whatever it takes to notify those making the decisions that this has to change.

For those wanting a bear hunt, do the same and explain why it works scientifically as well to utilize bear hunting as a management tool.

Tom Remington

Related Posts