My son and I have a moment when one of us says, “Hey, you know what? I got to thinking.” That is immediately followed by something like, “Oh, no! Do I need to sit down?”
Yesterday, I got thinking. You can begin your chorus of “oh, nos” if you’d like.
My son sent me a link to a guest opinion he found in the Bangor News from an extremely misinformed individual about what effects the recent policy change to allow concealed carry of guns in national parks is going to have for all of us. I’ll save the full rebuttal for another day but in the opening paragraph, the author, Stephanie Clement, conservation director for Friends of Acadia, blessed us with her political savvy and showed us that her knowledge of history goes way back perhaps 20 or 30 years and that might be a stretch.
In reference to the newly passed bill to allow concealed carry in national parks, this is what she said.
This is policy change motivated not by interest in bettering our national parks and the experience of all who visit them, but by a lame-duck presidential administration forcing its outgoing political views on our national heritage.
I wonder if the illness of Bush Derangement Syndrome will wane any after January 20th. A brief clarification on this. This policy change began with 51 U.S. Senators, both democrat and republican, signing a letter asking Secretary of the Interior, Dirk Kempthorne, to look into getting the draconian policy changed. It dates back to the Reagan years.
But I didn’t get thinking so much about the nauseating politics of whining, misinformed, cry-baby liberals and the hypocrisy of accusing Bush of forcing his political views all the while Ms. Clement wants to force her political views. Nope! I got thinking about the qualifier on the end of her statement – “on our national heritage”.
Think about this for a moment. Here’s a person who is attempting to tell the readers of the Bangor News that our national heritage bans the free exercise of our Constitutional right to keep and bear arms. Had she concluded her statement by saying that President Bush was trying to force is political views on those who believe the Bill of Rights makes good toilet paper, would have been more accurate.
I’m over it! I don’t much care whether Ms. Clement suffers from some incurable disease which symptoms are hysteria and delusion. I really don’t care that she sees anyone with a gun as a killer. I’d hate to live that way. What I do get upset about is the lack of any form of education that teaches people about our national heritage. It does go back a bit further than yesterday. For God’s sake! People today think our heritage involves the evolution of cell phones, computers and video games.
I moved beyond the anger and began to laugh. What possesses people to go public in order to show their ignorance? I do it for entertainment value. I hope you like it.
But seriously, though. Bush had nothing to do with this policy change and if someone wants to believe it’s a case of forcing political views, why is it forcing political views “on our national heritage”? And how do you do that anyway? This person was definitely born yesterday.
So, I got to thinking about my own heritage. I grew up the youngest of four boys. Nineteen years after I was born, my parents produced a baby sister. For the most part, all us boys had flown the nest when she came along but prior to that, we all grew up in the country in a house that had somewhere in the neighborhood of 500 square feet of living space. Yeah, yeah, I know. Extravagant, yes, but we needed the room to spread out.
We bathed every Saturday night, whether we needed to or not, in an old galvanized tub, hand-carrying our water. Being the youngest, I got sloppy fourth in line bath water. We possessed a one-hole outhouse and doubled up sleeping in one set of bunk beds. In other words we had everything anyone could want.
We stood our guns up in whatever corner of a room would allow and when we could afford ammunition, we did a lot of “plinking”. A favorite pastime was a trip to the town dump to shoot rats.
My brothers and I shared are own car before we were old enough to legally drive, creating our own race track in a neighboring, partly overgrown field.
My heritage I’m afraid is considerably different than that of Ms. Clement. You see, we didn’t need government telling us what we could and couldn’t do. We respected others and we let live. Government was something that kept an army to protect this country from people like Ms. Clement who want to steal our freedoms. For the power hungry, taking away freedom is the biggest tool for their success and over time we’ve handed them exactly what they want, albeit piece meal.
My heritage goes back to when I could speak freely and not be censored by something we’ve come to call political correctness. Growing up we referred to this as, sometimes the truth hurts. We didn’t talk about making laws every time we saw something we didn’t agree with and attitude adjustments took place out behind the barn.
But I’m afraid Ms. Clement is a closer representation of what America is today. For her convenience she chooses not to expand her national heritage back any further than what fits her “political views”. We sink gobs of money into a failed education system, one that no longer teaches about Ms. Clement’s prized “national heritage”. With each successive generation, “national heritage” becomes only in the eyes of the beholder.
What a shame!
Tom Remington


