<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DOD: Upon Further Review, Spent Military Brass Will Be Sold</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2009/03/18/dod-upon-further-review-spent-military-brass-will-be-sold/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2009/03/18/dod-upon-further-review-spent-military-brass-will-be-sold/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=dod-upon-further-review-spent-military-brass-will-be-sold</link>
	<description>Black Bear Blog - The Politics of Hunting, Fishing and the Outdoors. Protecting our American Heritage.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 08:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Remington</title>
		<link>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2009/03/18/dod-upon-further-review-spent-military-brass-will-be-sold/#comment-12856</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Remington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 14:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/?p=5652#comment-12856</guid>
		<description>Excellent point David and I agree with you assessment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point David and I agree with you assessment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2009/03/18/dod-upon-further-review-spent-military-brass-will-be-sold/#comment-12855</link>
		<dc:creator>David Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 14:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/?p=5652#comment-12855</guid>
		<description>This still leaves it open for doing business with china for the reuse of this brass in developing their own ammunition for resale to anyone. Spent brass cartridges should remain in the US.   

The last sentence of the reconsideration letter doesn&#039;t make me feel very good. I think they leave open the ability to change the conditions of sale at any time  to support Obama&#039;s on gun control.....    

Last statement was &quot;As was previously required, buyers who
purchase cartridge cases from the government must be approved to do so under Trade Security Controls&quot;.

I think we need to monitor &quot;Trade Security Controls&quot; closely</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This still leaves it open for doing business with china for the reuse of this brass in developing their own ammunition for resale to anyone. Spent brass cartridges should remain in the US.   </p>
<p>The last sentence of the reconsideration letter doesn&#8217;t make me feel very good. I think they leave open the ability to change the conditions of sale at any time  to support Obama&#8217;s on gun control&#8230;..    </p>
<p>Last statement was &#8220;As was previously required, buyers who<br />
purchase cartridge cases from the government must be approved to do so under Trade Security Controls&#8221;.</p>
<p>I think we need to monitor &#8220;Trade Security Controls&#8221; closely</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2009/03/18/dod-upon-further-review-spent-military-brass-will-be-sold/#comment-12853</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/?p=5652#comment-12853</guid>
		<description>I can just imagine what the Nitwits think tank meetings must sound like:   Now lets see what they do if we tell them that their wounded and maimed veterans won&#039;t get proper medical rehab!!  (Not that what they get now is all that great!) but have to fight it out with private insurance carriers. We could save some money here to pay for Nancy&#039;s commute.
 
 But on &quot;reconsideration&quot; just to save a few million dollars is grabbing at straws and putting the light on us, we work better in the dark we can&#039;t stand up to the light. We have to keep attention on the petty stuff, like those nasty AIG executives (who after all were only fulfilling their promises to their employees).

  Wonder if we can get away with asking the welfare recipients how they spend their money. (or to rephrase)  The  TAX paying dupes money.  

  What a bunch of HIPPOCRATES</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can just imagine what the Nitwits think tank meetings must sound like:   Now lets see what they do if we tell them that their wounded and maimed veterans won&#8217;t get proper medical rehab!!  (Not that what they get now is all that great!) but have to fight it out with private insurance carriers. We could save some money here to pay for Nancy&#8217;s commute.</p>
<p> But on &#8220;reconsideration&#8221; just to save a few million dollars is grabbing at straws and putting the light on us, we work better in the dark we can&#8217;t stand up to the light. We have to keep attention on the petty stuff, like those nasty AIG executives (who after all were only fulfilling their promises to their employees).</p>
<p>  Wonder if we can get away with asking the welfare recipients how they spend their money. (or to rephrase)  The  TAX paying dupes money.  </p>
<p>  What a bunch of HIPPOCRATES</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

