Are We Being “Chemed On” By Our Government To Control Global Warming?

That’s a bad idea trying to stop globa.., I mean, climate change. It must be
for something more simple like deforestation.

Those dark groves of trees cause to much heat.. meanwhile I got this nano looking thingy growing out my left shoulder…Don’t worry the environmentalists will save the world…

Are these the same ones that say they are ok with loosing some of the populas, you know, for the greater-go(o)d? Pretty incredible thinking, alright. That kind of thinking comes from so much learning doesn’t it. With such great thinking comes great courage to be first in line, I bet.

The video is in German but you can enlarge it and read the English transcript, The German military do not deny their part in the Aerosols campaign…

It’s okay though, you can trust your government and the environmentalists to save the world…They may kill us all off doing it but Ghia will make it through…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hAiABSmsKsg

LMAO..

I remember back a number of years ago, they (the government) used to warn us of the infusion of, what I remember as barium crystals which were spread in the atmosphere for their “studies”…they would predict large, colorful sky conditions, and unusual sunsets…

AS THE UNITED STATES CORP HAS 28 STATES HAVING RECORD LOW TEMPERATURES, WHAT HAVE YOU SEEN ON THE MAINSTREAM NEWS? ISN’T THAT A CLIMATE ISSUE? OF COURSE NOT AS IT’S COOLING NOT PHONY WARMING! WILLIAM COOPER WAS RIGHT AND WE’RE IN FOR AN ICE AGE LASTING AT LEAST FIFTY YEARS OR MORE!. EXPECT THE IONOSPHERIC HEATERS RUNNING FULL PELT SOON TO KEEP THE WARMING HOAX ALIVE IN THE SHEEP. HAARP, SOUSY, EISCAT, SUPERDARN ETC WILL BE BURNING OUT THESE ARE TIED INTO THE SHAPE/OPEN SKIES TREATY CHEMTRAIL PROGRAMS.

Global Cooling Under-Reported, Says SPPI

Washington, D.C. 1/23/2009 05:50 PM GMT (TransWorldNews)
http://www.transworldnews.com/NewsStory.aspx?id=74025&cat=12

The Earth has shown an under-reported cooling trend for eight straight years, raising serious questions about the accuracy of the UN’s climate projections, since not one of the computer models on which it relies had predicted so long and steep a cooling, says a new review paper — Temperature Change and CO2 Change – A Scientific Briefing –from the Science and Public Policy Institute, a Washington, D.C. think tank.

The paper posits that “The chief reason for scepticism at the official position on “global warming” is the overwhelming weight of evidence that the UN’s climate panel, the IPCC, prodigiously exaggerates both the supposed causes and the imagined consequences of anthropogenic “global warming”; that too many of the exaggerations can be demonstrated to have been deliberate; and that the IPCC and other official sources have continued to rely even upon those exaggerations that have been definitively demonstrated in the literature to have been deliberate.

“In short,” writes Monckton, “science is being artfully manipulated to the point of what are in essence political and not scientific conclusions – a conclusion that is congenial to powerful factions whose ambition is not to identify scientific truth but rather to advance the special vested interests with which they identify themselves.

The paper demonstrates that if CO2 concentration continues to rise more slowly than the IPCC had predicted, and if climate sensitivity to CO2 concentration is in any event well below the IPCC’s projected range, the likelihood of any “global warming” >2 °C/century to 2100 is vanishingly small.

Monckton also demonstrates that official sources have:

relied upon questionable and occasionally downright dishonest methods to inflate the observed rate of temperature increase
created the false impression that the rate of increase is itself rising when an identical argument can be used to demonstrate that it is falling
diminished earlier and warmer temperatures in this century
abolished the mediaeval warm period
diverted attention away from the fact that throughout almost all of the Holocene, and throughout all four previous interglacial periods, surface temperatures were considerably warmer than they are today.

Says SPPI president, Robert Ferguson, “When the climate science is wrong, the policies are wrong, and then both people and the environment are harmed. It is past time that the media and elected officials stop treating “man-made global warming” as a religion and started asking some serious and pointed questions. This paper lays the ground work for that.”

The entire paper can be accessed at: http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton…e_briefing.html

Contact: Robert Ferguson, Science and Public Policy Institute

http://www.scienceandpublicpolicy.org/

bferguson@sppinstitute.org

202-288-5699

Robert Felix – Global Warming – Global Cooling

Part 1 of 3:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jEE1_0i_rY

Part 2 of 3:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Dy_s1XtSTs&feature=related

Part 3 of 3:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXtX_fiZG9o&feature=related