Crap And Invade

Home > Crap And Invade

As the Marxist government of Barack Hussein Obama continues its march to destroy America – you know, the one he said was the greatest in the world and then invited others to help him change it? – we are once again witness to an out-of-control, completely ignorant and incompetent Congress who passed a House bill worth a cool $4 trillion. The bill was a thousand pages and not one idiot in Washington read it. Nor do they really care, I guess. And either you approve of this kind of business or you will do something about it at the polls.

I’ll call the bill, crap and invade, as it is all crap based on crap, spread like crap and it even tastes like crap. I’ll call it invade because it is an invasion into my freedoms of being an American. I am going to be forced into paying ungodly amounts of money to fund a corrupt program, based on theories concocted by non-scientists. This kind of government strong arm tactics does nothing except rob me of my liberty to be free and prosper.

The “settled science” of Al Gore’s lying, scheming and cheating global warming “inconvenient truth” is aimed at adding the finishing touches to the destruction of capitalism and America as we know it. The cost to administer this bill will sink us all and put us on target to become subjects of a dictatorial government led by one man who grew up learning to hate America and blame her for everything bad in the world. The man needs therapy, dudes!

Michelle Malkin unveils the web of deceit that the EPA seems to have undertaken to stifle any contrary opinions to Obama’s convenient science, the science he said would now be used in making decisions that should be based on science not ideology.

This comes as no surprise to me and it really shouldn’t to anyone else who is not an Obama Kool-Aid drinker. Did you really believe Obama’s statements last March when he declared he would “restore the scientific process” to decisions like the gray wolf and other endangered species? If you did you were a fool.

I said then that what we would see would be Obama’s science in rendering decisions and that is exactly what we are seeing. He wants to control every aspect of our lives and another way is to use climate change as a very powerful weapon because there are enough stupid people on this planet who hate humans and all that they do, therefore we are the blame for everything, including climate change. For that we must pay and we will pay big.

Obama selected a person well known for her disregard of law when he picked New Jersey Environmental czar under Gov. Corzine to head up his Department of Environmental Protection. There was a reason he picked her. She, along with Gov. Corzine, defied known science and opted to create their own science of convenience in dealing with such issues as an overgrown population of black bears in the Garden State. When Corzine, a known anti-hunter, liberal, human hater, took office, he appointed Jackson his puppet. One of her first acts as head of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection was to take a court-approved black bear management plan and toss it in the garbage. She cared less about existing science when it comes to wildlife management. It didn’t fit her and the governor’s ideology and therefore it was tossed aside. Since then both have refused to entertain any other opinions.

And this is the reason Obama picked Jackson. A veteran player willing to thumb their noses at sound, proven science and stand strong in opposition to any good science that might run contrary to the Obama administration’s “scientific process”.

Obama pushed to pass another thousand-page bill, which no idiot in Washington has read, while Jackson worked behind the scenes to stifle any science that would oppose Obama’s fascist actions to use any crisis, real or created, to pound the masses into submission.

We now know that Obama’s declaration to restore HIS science is an easy task, when having to work with a Congress so full of the most ignorant, lazy, gutless, inept people this country has to offer.

In short, Obama’s promise for hopenchange, is utilizing Washington’s business-as-usual, to manipulate the leaders of this country to do as he says, while the masses worry about poor Michael Jackson. This is a script even Hitler would have lapped his chops over.

Toast! Maybe even burnt toast!

Tom Remington

Greg Farber

Here’s several of Obama’s promises he broke already..

By Joel Skousen
Editor – World Affairs Brief
6-26-9

I’ve lost count of how many times Barack Obama has claimed he was going to change the way Washington does business, how he was going to cut off the role of the big corporate lobbyists, stop government use of secrecy to cover for illegal actions, make government more accountable and transparent, stop corruption, and end cronyism. The record indicates that all these are part of the Big Lie–a concerted effort to deceive his own followers and the nation. Only the establishment media is silent about this growing dichotomy. None of the White House press corps dares question him in public about his backtracking. The Republican opposition (who backed these same evil practices when they were in power) has taken notice, but not as much as principled liberals who feel betrayed by his promises of change. This week I’ll start off by reviewing the magnitude of the hypocrisy and deception. It’s an impressive listing.

The addition of new regulations that only pretend to solve the financial corruption between government and Wall Street and the draconian new Health Care reform packages are bad enough, but it is the continuance of government secrecy, spying, indefinite detention without charge, and cronyism that is the greatest danger to our liberties. Perhaps no one has documented this more than Glen Greenwald, writing for Salon.com.

“‘My Administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in Government’ — Barack Obama, January 28, 2009. Promising ‘a new era of openness in our country,’ President Obama [said]: ‘Transparency and the rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency’ — CNN, January 21, 2009. “A democracy requires accountability, and accountability requires transparency… All agencies should adopt a presumption in favor of disclosure, in order to renew their commitment to the principles embodied in Freedom of Information Act [FOIA], and to usher in a new era of open Government’ — Barack Obama, January 21, 2009. Greenwald demands to know, “Has Obama fulfilled those pledges and lived up to those commitments — even remotely? Just examine the facts and judge for yourself.

“February 9, New York Times: ‘In a closely watched case involving rendition and torture [Mohamed v. Jeppesen Data], a lawyer for the Obama administration seemed to surprise a panel of federal appeals judges on Monday by pressing ahead with an argument for preserving state secrets originally developed by the Bush administration.’

“February 21, Huffington Post: ‘The Obama administration, siding with former President George W. Bush, is trying to kill a lawsuit that seeks to recover what could be millions of missing White House e-mails.’

“February 27, AP: ‘The Obama administration has lost its argument that a potential threat to national security should stop a lawsuit challenging the government’s warrantless wiretapping program. . . . The Obama administration, like the Bush administration before it, claimed national security would be compromised if a lawsuit brought by the Oregon chapter of the charity, Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, was allowed to proceed.’

“April 7, The Atlantic: ‘The Obama Administration still wants to keep its secrets. Yesterday, the Justice Department [in a case brought against Bush officials for illegal spying] embraced the argument that the state secrets privilege . . . should shut down any litigation against the National Security Agency for its arguably illegal warrantless surveillance program. ‘

“April 28, NY Times: A federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that a lawsuit brought by five men who say they were tortured as part of the Central Intelligence Agency’s ‘extraordinary rendition’ program could proceed, dealing a blow to efforts by both the Bush and Obama administrations to claim sweeping executive secrecy powers. ‘

“May 12, Washington Times: ‘The Obama administration says it may curtail Anglo-American intelligence sharing if the British High Court discloses new details of the treatment of a former Guantanamo detainee. . . . In February, the British Foreign Office claimed that the U.S. government had threatened to reduce intelligence cooperation if details of the interrogations and treatment of Mr. Mohamed were disclosed. ‘

“May 14, Washington Post: ‘President Obama yesterday chose secrecy over disclosure, saying he will seek to block the court-ordered release of photographs depicting the abuse of detainees [including rape] held by U.S. authorities abroad. ‘

“May 22, San Francisco Chronicle: ‘A federal judge on Friday threatened to severely sanction the Obama Administration for withholding a top secret document he ordered given to lawyers suing the government over its warrantless wiretapping program. . . . The National Security Agency has also refused the judge’s previous orders to provide security clearances to two of the charity’s lawyers so they can view the top secret document. ‘

“June 1, Washington Post Editorial page: ‘The [Graham-Lieberman] measure, supported by the White House and passed May 21 as an attachment to a Senate funding bill, would put beyond the reach of FOIA any photographs taken between Sept. 11, 2001, and Jan. 22, 2009 . . . [W]hat makes the administration’s support for the photographic records act so regrettable [is that in] taking a step aimed at protecting the country’s service members [who acted criminally], Mr. Obama runs the risk of taking two steps back in his quest for more open government.

“June 9, Washington Post: ‘The Obama administration objected yesterday to the release of certain Bush-era documents that detail the videotaped interrogations of CIA detainees at secret prisons, arguing to a federal judge that doing so would endanger national security and benefit al-Qaeda’s recruitment efforts. In an affidavit, CIA Director Leon E. Panetta defended the classification of records describing the contents of the 92 videotapes, their destruction by the CIA in 2005 and what he called ‘sensitive operational information’ about the interrogations. ‘

“June 12, AP: ‘The Obama administration has decided to keep secret the locations of nearly four dozen coal ash storage sites that pose a threat to people living nearby. The Environmental Protection Agency classified the 44 sites as potential hazards to communities while investigating storage of coal ash waste after a spill at a Tennessee power plant in December. ‘

“June 16, McClatchy: ‘Defense Department officials are debating whether to ignore an earlier promise and squelch the release of an investigation into a U.S. airstrike last month, out of fear that its findings would further enrage the Afghan public, Pentagon officials told McClatchy Monday. ‘

“June 16, ABC News: ‘After being briefed today on President Obama’s firing last week of Gerald Walpin, Inspector General of the Corporation for National and Community Service, Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., said the president did not abide by the same law that he co-sponsored — and she wrote — about firing Inspectors General. . . . ‘The legislation which was passed last year requires that the president give a reason for the removal,’ McCaskill, a key Obama ally, said that the president’s stated reason for the termination, ‘Loss of confidence’ is not a sufficient reason. ‘

“June 17, Washington Post: “President Obama has embraced Bush administration justifications for denying public access to White House visitor logs even as advisers say they are reviewing the policy of keeping secret the official record of comings and goings.

“Finally, it’s worth emphasizing that the above excerpts pertain only to transparency issues. None of this has anything to do with what The New York Times in May — referring to Obama’s Bush-replicating policies on detention, rendition, denial of habeas rights, military commission and the like — described as ‘how he has backtracked, in substantial if often nuanced ways, from the approach to national security that he preached as a candidate, and even from his first days in the Oval Office.’ No matter how you look at it, this is quite a record.”

More to come….
Greg Farber

Cap and trade’ your freedom

Posted: June 27, 2009
http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=102263

I’m going to take a wild guess and say that 5 percent of Americans could give an accurate definition of what “cap and trade” means.

We hear the phrase a lot. It has what I call a high MEGO factor. MEGO is a news industry acronym for “my eyes glaze over.”

Nevertheless, the plan by Barack Obama and the Democratic Congress to institute a “cap and trade” system on the production of carbon dioxide and other so-called “greenhouse gases” (the principal one being water vapor, by the way) is nothing more than a plot to destroy the American economy once and for all.

You think I’m kidding?

Here are a few facts to consider:
The plan is based on largely pseudo-science suggesting that these natural gases (not pollutants) are causing massive, catastrophic climate change.

The plan is based on the idea that increases in these gases are caused by man’s activity on the planet, even though man-made carbon dioxide and water vapor represent an infinitesimally small amount of the carbon dioxide and water vapor in our atmosphere.

Historic tracking of the relationship of carbon dioxide volume in the atmosphere and temperature increases does indeed correlate a trend – but not the way Al Gore explains it. Carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere follow warming trends. They don’t precede them.

There is no evidence that small fluctuations in global temperatures actually lead to devastating results. In fact, they are often beneficial – and they are cyclical.

The planet has been much colder in man’s history. And it has been much warmer in history. These trends occurred before man was involved in major industry.

Is Al Gore being disingenuous? Read the truth about climate change in “Red Hot Lies: How Global Warming Alarmists Use Threats, Fraud, and Deception to Keep You Misinformed”

But let’s put all that aside for a moment. Let’s pretend the assumptions of Al Gore and a handful of government-paid scientists are correct – the planet really is warming because of man’s activity.

The “cap and trade” system about to be imposed on Americans will do nothing to stop or reverse the amount of “greenhouse gases” spewing into the world’s atmosphere – not even close.

It will, however, destroy the economy.

Both India and China are increasingly putting out more carbon dioxide than we could ever stop putting out. China has been adding a new 500 megawatt coal or gas-burning plant about every week or two, with hundreds more planned. So, even if the U.S. places on its own businesses strict limits on the production of carbon dioxide and other “greenhouse gases,” India and China will more than make up the difference by adding new carbon dioxide-emitting generating plants.

That means the worldwide emissions of CO2 are gong to continue to rise even if we decide to kill the American economy and go back to the horse-and-buggy days.

We can’t possibly do anything to reduce world levels of CO2 unless India and China stop developing cold in their tracks. They would indeed need to start shutting down some of those electrical generating plants and remain part of the “Third World.” That is not going to happen.

And that is all you really need to know about “cap and trade” – unless, of course, you want to destroy the U.S. economy, which, I am afraid, is exactly what Barack Obama and the Democratic Congress seek to do.

“Cap and trade” is not a solution to climate change. It is a prescription for taking America down as a world power, as a free nation and as the most prosperous country on the planet.
Greg Farber

John Boenher proves the climate bill is trash
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rPpSdCMGAA
Greg Farber

CEI Releases Global Warming Study Censored by EPA

The Public Shouldn’t Be Kept in the Dark by an Agency Supposedly Committed to Transparency

by Richard Morrison
June 25, 2009
http://cei.org/news-release/2009/06/25/cei-releases-global-warming-study-censored-epa

Washington, D.C., June 26, 2009—The Competitive Enterprise Institute is today making public an internal study on climate science which was suppressed by the Environmental Protection Agency. Internal EPA email messages, released by CEI earlier in the week, indicate that the report was kept under wraps and its author silenced because of pressure to support the Administration’s agenda of regulating carbon dioxide.

The report finds that EPA, by adopting the United Nations’ 2007 “Fourth Assessment” report, is relying on outdated research and is ignoring major new developments. Those developments include a continued decline in global temperatures, a new consensus that future hurricanes will not be more frequent or intense, and new findings that water vapor will moderate, rather than exacerbate, temperature.

New data also indicate that ocean cycles are probably the most important single factor in explaining temperature fluctuations, though solar cycles may play a role as well, and that reliable satellite data undercut the likelihood of endangerment from greenhouse gases. All of this demonstrates EPA should independently analyze the science, rather than just adopt the conclusions of outside organizations.

The released report is a draft version, prepared under EPA’s unusually short internal review schedule, and thus may contain inaccuracies which were corrected in the final report.

“While we hoped that EPA would release the final report, we’re tired of waiting for this agency to become transparent, even though its Administrator has been talking transparency since she took office. So we are releasing a draft version of the report ourselves, today,” said CEI General Counsel Sam Kazman.

CEI is a non-profit, non-partisan public policy group dedicated to the principles of free enterprise and limited government. For more information about CEI, please visit our website at http://www.cei.org.

Crap And Invade

Related Posts

Tom Remington

Related Sites

Archives
Categories