It’s laughable in some ways, sick justice in another. But when you witness liars being lied to by someone they lied to to begin with and the liar lied back in order to capture a vote, the liars are mad and making up more lies. Does any of that make any sense? Probably as much as Jamie Rappaport Clark’s drivel in the Washington Post does.
(The photo to the left shows what you could be saving by not listening to people like Jamie Rappaport Clark.)
The sick injustice comes upon seeing the environmental nut jobs, like Defenders of Wildlife whom Clark is joined at the hip with, become prey to the onslaught of Obama’s lies that the rest of the nation has had to endure since taking office. How you like it?
We all heard and I wrote about Obama’s promise to “restore the scientific process to its rightful place at the heart of the Endangered Species Act.” The environmentalists broke out in a unified orgasm, licking each others drool in anticipation of “The One” who would thrown down his staff and part the waters of the Endangered Species Act and bring extinct species back to life. There was only one big problem. Obama lied to them too or in this case it was more of Obama lied and the environmentalists over reacted.
So now we all know what Obama is about. He’s a liar, a green horn, a ditherer and a blatherer and knows not what he does. So, people like Rappaport Clark have decided to take up the public relations campaign of indoctrination by lies in order to get what they want through their tried and true methods of suing the government using the money they got from the government to stay in business.
Usually, I break down articles like Clark’s to deliberately point out the deceitful lies, half truths, misdirected statements, etc. Hers’ is so bad, it’s not worth 2 minutes of my time. All I will say though is that it’s disgusting. Anyone with any sense of a moral backbone would be ashamed to put their name on something so foul.
Tom Remington
