Comments on: Thomas Sowell On McDonald v. Chicago

By: Barry

Barry — Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:54:56 +0000

Jes- I could count the politicians that listen to their constituents or that are not puppets on one hand. A sad reality of our current system.

By: jes

jes — Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:51:37 +0000

Greg, to some extent, I think all politicians are puppets, they dance to the tune of their constituency…and many of their constituents have an immoral base.

By: Barry

Barry — Wed, 30 Jun 2010 12:49:32 +0000

I have to agree with Greg here, they would love nothing more than for us to ‘throw the first punch’, this guy is a robot, he’s been thoroughly groomed since a young age.

The G20 is the perfect example, he’s not ever aware enough to realize that you have to at least present a front like you know whats happening. Or do they? Perhaps it is just a manufactured disagreement for our viewing pleasure????

By: Greg Farber

Greg Farber — Wed, 30 Jun 2010 12:28:19 +0000

I mean shit guys, these bastards score, they kick off to us, and we get it on the twenty and we’re four and out and we punt.. Then they score again.. I’m sick of it.

By: Greg Farber

Greg Farber — Wed, 30 Jun 2010 12:25:32 +0000

Any man who allows himself to be a puppet for others is no man at all.. Even if you are being a puppet for readers who cannot deal with the damn truth..

By: Greg Farber

Greg Farber — Wed, 30 Jun 2010 12:23:08 +0000

They want civil unrest, like I keep saying, civil unrest is the agenda. The Jesuits are infamous for orchestrating Civil unrest which brings about the Order THEY are looking for over US.. Order out of Chaos.. This guy is a puppet and as long as people keep giving him any credibility beyond puppetry and keep ignoring those pulling his strings THEY keep getting off scott free with their crap. Puppets are someiones slave, doing someones bidding.. Dammit, continuing to blow it off just proves we deserve to lose.

By: jes

jes — Wed, 30 Jun 2010 12:02:43 +0000

Obama has the philosophy of changing the constitution according to the interpretations of contemporary life. He learned this philosophy at the hands of the Joyce Foundation, where he worked on changing the “interpretation” of law in court cases where the second amendment was being questioned as not being an individual right, but the right of the military. This activist part of his life has not been brought to light except in the back annals of the internet, where his records of employment and the Joyce Foundation’s efforts have been recorded. How anyone could have believed that Obama had any approval of individual ownership of firearms, is what I could not understand, considering his records, which speak for themselves….

One thing he is right about: The SCOTUS has the capability of changing the laws, no matter what we think of their actions. Their “interpretation” of law is what becomes law….no matter what their motives. The only influence we the people can have, would be mass and disruptive demonstrations, which is what took place during the Roe vs Wade decision….and even then, there is no telling if the threat of civil unrest is going to change any of their minds.. And these days, as always, just one vote can determine the future of whether a nation can or will survive.