<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Black Bear Blog &#187; Nebraska Hunting News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/category/nebraska-hunting-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb</link>
	<description>Black Bear Blog - The Politics of Hunting, Fishing and the Outdoors. Protecting our American Heritage.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:49:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>RMEF&#8217;s 2011 Elk Hunting Forecast</title>
		<link>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2011/08/17/rmefs-2011-elk-hunting-forecast/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rmefs-2011-elk-hunting-forecast</link>
		<comments>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2011/08/17/rmefs-2011-elk-hunting-forecast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Remington</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alaska Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hunting Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idaho Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saskatchewan Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wyoming Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elk hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hunting forecast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rocky mountain elk foundation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/?p=15349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MISSOULA, Mont.&#8211;Winterkill, habitat problems and wolves have driven elk numbers down in some areas. But many of America&#8217;s roughly 800,000 elk hunters have reason to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MISSOULA, Mont.&#8211;Winterkill, habitat problems and wolves have driven elk numbers down in some areas. But many of America&#8217;s roughly 800,000 elk hunters have reason to be optimistic about upcoming seasons, based on hunt forecasts compiled by the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation.</p>
<p>(Note: The following data, compiled from state and provincial wildlife agencies, reflect biologists&#8217; best estimates of elk populations. Each year, animal rights activists blatantly misrepresent these data to prop up their argument for keeping wolves perpetually on the Endangered Species List. It&#8217;s a fact that where wolves are concentrated, elk herds are being impacted. Calf survival rates in certain areas are too low to sustain herds for the future. Wolves must be managed, same as elk. In spite of the misuse, RMEF believes these data are valuable to hunters and will continue to provide them.)</p>
<p>Following are condensed forecasts for 29 states and provinces. See full-length versions at <a href="http://www.rmef.org/hunting/features" target="_blank">www.rmef.org/hunting/features</a>. For even more detailed coverage, see the Sept./Oct. 2011 edition of the RMEF member magazine, Bugle. To join, call 800-CALL ELK.</p>
<p>RMEF members have now helped to conserve or enhance 5.9 million acres of habitat for elk and other wildlife.</p>
<p>In the forecast intro, Bugle Hunting Editor P.J. DelHomme notes, &#8220;When RMEF launched in 1984, there were 550,000 elk in North America. Fifteen states and four provinces had elk hunts. Today almost 1.2 million wild elk roam the continent and 23 states and six provinces are holding elk hunts. There&#8217;s also been a huge surge of bulls entering the record books, with world records for Roosevelt&#8217;s, tules and non-typical Rocky Mountain elk all falling in the past decade.&#8221;</p>
<p>This may indeed be the Golden Era of elk hunting. Good luck this autumn!</p>
<p>Alaska<br />
Elk Population: Etolin (GMU 3) 300-400, Kodiak Archipelago (GMU <img src='http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> N/A<br />
Bull/Cow Ratio: GMU 3 19/100<br />
Nonresidents: $85 license, $300 elk permit<br />
Hunter Success: GMU 3 13 percent, GMU 8 N/A<br />
Highlights: Most elk in GMU 3 reside within the formidable South Etolin Island Wilderness on Etolin Island, where 48 hunters braved the bush to kill six bulls last season. Calf recruitment is good at 51 calves to every 100 cows. Numbers for GMU 8 on the Kodiak Archipelago were not available at press time, but the area has yielded some impressive Roosevelt&#8217;s bulls in the past few years. Visit <a href="http://www.wildlife.alaska.gov" target="_blank">www.wildlife.alaska.gov</a>.</p>
<p>Alberta<br />
Elk Population: 33,000<br />
Bull/Cow Ratio: N/A<br />
Nonresidents: $255, must hire a guide<br />
Hunter Success: N/A<br />
Highlights: Elk populations in the foothills of the Rockies, especially west of Rocky Mountain House, this year felt the combined impact of months of deep snow and predation by wolves, mountain lions and grizzlies. However, range is expanding as elk pioneer new territory to the south and east, with some respectable bulls among them. Meat hunters should look at agricultural zones where liberal permits for cows are available. Outfitters receive roughly 10 percent of the draw tags. Visit <a href="http://www.srd.alberta.ca" target="_blank">www.srd.alberta.ca</a>.</p>
<p>Arizona<br />
Elk Population: 25,000-35,000<br />
Bull/Cow Ratio: 35/100<br />
Nonresidents: $151 license (nonrefundable) plus $595 elk permit<br />
Hunter Success: 31 percent general, 39 percent muzzleloader, 24 percent archery<br />
Highlights: The Wallow fire burned over 520,000 acres in Units 1 and 27 and many elk have been displaced to other areas. A silver lining? These units could see even more monster bulls in coming years if forage responds as it did following the massive Rodeo-Chediski fire in 2002. A mild winter meant low stress on elk but also led to a dry spring&#8211;hence the massive wildfires. Arizona Game and Fish Department&#8217;s &#8220;Hunt Arizona&#8221; offers a great resource on harvest data, drawing odds and hunting pressure. Visit <a href="http://www.azgfd.gov" target="_blank">www.azgfd.gov</a>.</p>
<p>Arkansas<br />
Elk Population: 440<br />
Bull/Cow Ratio: 40/100<br />
Nonresidents: Auction and landowner tags<br />
Hunter Success: 63 percent<br />
Highlights: Elk permits are available to landowners in a five-county area, with 23 permits issued under a quota system. Anyone who owns property in those counties, whether or not they are a resident, qualifies for the drawing. Nonresidents who buy a lifetime license also are eligible for the drawing. Public land hunters will find elk using an increasing number and quality of managed forage openings on the Ozark National Forest and Gene Rush WMA. Visit <a href="http://www.agfc.com" target="_blank">www.agfc.com</a>.</p>
<p>British Columbia<br />
Elk Population: 63,000<br />
Bull/Cow Ratio: 25-30/100<br />
Nonresidents: $180 license plus $250 elk permit, must hire a guide<br />
Hunter Success: N/A<br />
Highlights: Rocky Mountain elk herds are thriving, with the agricultural zones in the Peace River region a great bet. For a backcountry experience, look to the Omineca region in north-central BC. If you&#8217;ve always dreamed of hunting a trophy Roosevelt&#8217;s bull, the stars are aligned for a great season. No limits or quotas have changed since last season, and limited-entry tags are still a tough draw at roughly 35/1. Outfitters are allotted a percentage of those tags and you can bypass the long odds by booking a hunt. The $430 cost for a license and permit is a relative bargain. Visit <a href="http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/fw" target="_blank">www.env.gov.bc.ca/fw</a>.</p>
<p>California<br />
Elk Population: 11,400 (1,500 Rocky Mountain, 6,000 Roosevelt&#8217;s, 3,900 tule)<br />
Bull/Cow Ratios: 20/100 to 90/100<br />
Nonresidents: $151 license (nonrefundable to enter drawing) plus $1,200 elk permit<br />
Hunter Success: 75 percent<br />
Highlights: The West&#8217;s best hunter success rates and world-class bulls of all three sub-species await those who beat tag lottery odds ranging from 100/1 to 1,000/1. This could be the year a tule world record is broken. The largest brutes are in the East Park Reservoir and Grizzly Island units. Good spring rains should have racks in prime shape. For a backcountry experience, try Marble Mountain Wilderness, which offers 35 bull tags, 10 antlerless and 5 late-season muzzleloader/archery either-sex tags. Everyone has a shot here, as 10 of those tags (nine bull and one cow) are randomly drawn while the other 30 are weighted for preference points. Visit <a href="http://www.dfg.ca.gov" target="_blank">www.dfg.ca.gov</a>.</p>
<p>Colorado<br />
Elk Population: 283,400<br />
Bull/Cow Ratio: 32/100<br />
Nonresidents: $354 cow, $554 any elk<br />
Hunter Success: 22 percent<br />
Highlights: Colorado is an ideal destination with more than 23 million acres of public land, almost twice as many elk as any other state, over-the-counter bull tags (OTC), and an informative call-center. Rifle tags for bulls in the 2nd and 3rd season are unlimited and sold at outlets all over the state. Leftover draw tags went on sale August 9 and some may still be available. OTC rifle tags for cows are limited, but OTC antlerless archery tags are wide open in the northwest and southeast corners. The past few years have been moist with heavy snows and wet springs, which have kept forage lush and antler growth robust. Visit <a href="http://www.wildlife.state.co.us/Hunting" target="_blank">www.wildlife.state.co.us/Hunting</a>.</p>
<p>Idaho<br />
Elk Population: 103,000<br />
Bull/Cow Ratio: 23/100<br />
Nonresidents: $155 license, $417 elk tag<br />
Hunter Success: 19 percent<br />
Highlights: The Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness is being hammered by wolf predation exacerbated by a long slide in forage quality. Elk populations are far below management objectives in the Lolo and Selway zones and slightly below objectives in the Sawtooth zone. Elk and hunting aren&#8217;t what they used to be in the Frank Church-River of No Return Wilderness, either. Statewide, elk tag sales fell from 92,565 in 2008 to 84,765 in 2010&#8211;a decline of about 8 percent. But not all the news from Idaho is bad. Populations at or above objectives in 20 of 29 elk hunt zones, and the statewide population actually broke a long plummet and grew by 2,000 animals from last year. Hunters should look to the southern and western portions of the state, as well as areas like the Owyhee-South Hills Zone, where hunters can now chase antlerless elk August through December. Visit <a href="http://www.fishandgame.idaho.gov" target="_blank">www.fishandgame.idaho.gov</a>.</p>
<p>Kansas<br />
Elk Population: 250-275<br />
Bull/Cow Ratio: 40/100<br />
Nonresidents: Tenant permits and one Commissioner&#8217;s Permit, usually sold at auction<br />
Hunter Success: 36 percent<br />
Highlights: This past season was a tough one for Kansas elk hunters. On Fort Riley, where most of the state&#8217;s elk roam, hunters had their second-lowest success rate since the hunt began there in 1987. This year, 10 either-sex and 15 antlerless tags are available. Mammoth bulls exist but don&#8217;t come easily. The state&#8217;s other main elk herd roams the opposite corner far to the southwest in the Cimarron National Grasslands. The Grasslands themselves are closed to hunting, but over-the-counter unlimited permits are available for surrounding private lands. Visit <a href="http://www.kdwp.state.ks.us" target="_blank">www.kdwp.state.ks.us</a>.</p>
<p>Kentucky<br />
Elk Population: 10,000<br />
Bull/Cow Ratio: 35-40/100<br />
Nonresidents: $10 to apply, $130 license, $365 elk permit<br />
Hunter Success: 65 percent<br />
Highlights: The toughest part here is beating the odds in the drawing. This year, 61,500 applicants vied for 800 elk hunting permits, with 80 permits reserved for the nearly 19,000 nonresidents who applied. But elk look to be plentiful. A calf recruitment ratio of roughly 85/100 means nearly 2,000 more elk hit the ground each year. Also, hunting success was down last year as the acorn crop was big and the elk stayed in the hardwoods and out of the open, plus ice and snowstorms coincided with key weekends. This year, managers have dropped the 4-point or better antler restriction. Visit <a href="http://www.fw.ky.gov" target="_blank">www.fw.ky.gov</a>.</p>
<p>Manitoba<br />
Elk Population: 6,100<br />
Bull/Cow Ratio: 45/100<br />
Residents only<br />
Hunter Success: 20-60 percent rifle, 5-10 percent archery<br />
Highlights: You have to live in the province to draw an elk permit, and they&#8217;re avidly sought. Some very large bulls roam this country. The Duck Mountain, Interlake and Porcupine regions are all consistent trophy producers. The province has numerous elk seasons running from late August through December. Visit <a href="http://www.gov.mb.ca/conservation/wildlife/hunting/" target="_blank">www.gov.mb.ca/conservation/wildlife/hunting/</a>.</p>
<p>Michigan<br />
Elk Population: 780<br />
Bull/Cow Ratio: 60/100<br />
Residents only<br />
Hunter Success: 70-90 percent<br />
Highlights: Managers have the elk population where they want it and are in maintenance mode, which explains why available elk permits dropped by roughly 30 percent. Applications this year were down slightly, with 35,000 people vying for 55 any-elk and 100 antlerless tags. Improving timber management and habitat on public land should mean more elk hunting opportunity in the future. Visit <a href="http://www.michigan.gov/dnrhunting" target="_blank">www.michigan.gov/dnrhunting</a>.</p>
<p>Minnesota<br />
Elk Population: 175<br />
Bull/Cow Ratio: 50/100<br />
Residents only<br />
Hunter Success: 72 percent<br />
Highlights: Less than 1,000 hunters applied in 2010 for the dozen once-in-a-lifetime elk tags available (at $250 each). But a widely publicized monster bull scoring 458-4/8 was found in Minnesota last year, and word got out that this state can grow massive trophies. No word yet on whether applications rose. The state has two herds. Managers counted 35-40 elk in the Grygla herd, which is a couple more than what the management plan calls for, and 141 elk in the &#8220;border herd.&#8221; Visit <a href="http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/hunting/elk" target="_blank">www.dnr.state.mn.us/hunting/elk</a>.</p>
<p>Montana<br />
Elk Population: 150,000<br />
Bull/Cow Ratio: 5-25/100<br />
Nonresidents: $812<br />
Hunter Success: 16 percent<br />
Highlights: The biggest news for nonresidents is the 37 percent jump in the price of an elk permit. A ballot initiative last November abolished 5,500 outfitter-sponsored licenses and forced all nonresident hunters into the drawing. For those who drew a bull tag in the Bear Paws or Big Snowies, the higher fees could be money well spent, as the bulls there are growing old and big. Winter was tough in parts of central and eastern Montana, but elk in the legendary Missouri River Breaks came through fine. Hunters would be smart to look at Region 3, which yields almost 50 percent of the annual elk harvest, including some big bulls. Wolves have taken a brutal toll on some herds. In the Danaher Basin of the Bob Marshall Wilderness, cow/calf ratios are just 9/100, down from a long-term average of 24/100. Herds in the West Fork of the Bitterroot and the lower Clark Fork watershed are in steep decline, and the famed northern Yellowstone herd continues to plummet. Visit <a href="http://www.fwp.mt.gov" target="_blank">www.fwp.mt.gov</a>.</p>
<p>Nebraska<br />
Elk Population: 2,300<br />
Bull/Cow Ratio: 50/50<br />
Residents only<br />
Hunter Success: 61 percent<br />
Highlights: Landowners are allotted one-third of all elk tags, and this year, both landowners and the general public will have the best opportunity in a decade with 294 tags, up 22 from last year. For public-land hunters, the rugged Pine Ridge in the northern panhandle offers good odds as three units there hold more than half the state&#8217;s elk herd, two-thirds of the total permit allocation and more than 100,000 acres of public land.<br />
Visit <a href="http://www.outdoornebraska.ne.gov/hunting" target="_blank">www.outdoornebraska.ne.gov/hunting</a>.</p>
<p>Nevada<br />
Elk Population: 13,500<br />
Bull/Cow Ratio: 32/100<br />
Nonresidents: $142 license plus $1,200 tag<br />
Hunter Success: 47 percent<br />
Highlights: Through the drawing, an elk tag costs well over a grand, and that&#8217;s a steal compared to the 89 private landowner tags that sold for more than $7,800 on average last year. But 66 percent of the bulls killed last year were six-points or better, many of them jaw-droppers. Nevada&#8217;s herd has grown dramatically, swelling by 10 percent this year alone. That&#8217;s great news for residents who get 4,600 tags&#8211;a good thousand more than last year. Nonresidents are allotted 133 and odds of drawing one were 1/44 in 2009. Visit <a href="http://www.ndow.org/hunt" target="_blank">www.ndow.org/hunt</a>.</p>
<p>New Mexico<br />
Elk Population: 75,000-95,000<br />
Bull/Cow Ratio: 40-45/100<br />
Nonresidents: $555 standard bull, $780 quality bull<br />
Hunter Success: 33 percent<br />
Highlights: A mild winter and expected monsoons should have elk in top shape this fall. The state is split roughly into 30 percent &#8220;quality&#8221; units (big bulls, small odds) and 70 percent &#8220;opportunity&#8221; units. Hunters looking for plenty of opportunity should focus on the north-central units including Unit 36 where elk herds continue to grow and managers have issued more permits. For last-minute nonresident hunters with cash to spend, landowner tags are your ticket. Hunters will have a little more time to get their bull this year, with shooting hours expanded to 30 minutes before sunrise and after sunset. Visit <a href="http://www.wildlife.state.nm.us" target="_blank">www.wildlife.state.nm.us</a>.</p>
<p>North Dakota<br />
Elk Population: 1,200<br />
Bull/Cow Ratio: N/A<br />
Nonresidents: One raffle tag available<br />
Hunter Success: 49 percent<br />
Highlights: For the past few years, North Dakota has had far more elk than managers wanted. That changed last fall and winter as hunters in Theodore Roosevelt National Park culled 406 elk out of an estimated 950. Managers still hope to get numbers under 400 and another shoot is likely this year. Outside of the park, elk can be found in the northeast corner and along the west-central border, with estimated numbers at around 450. Other small herds are scattered in pockets throughout the state. This year, managers will issue 500 tags&#8211;355 any-sex and 145 antlerless tags. Visit <a href="http://www.gf.nd.gov/hunting" target="_blank">www.gf.nd.gov/hunting</a>.</p>
<p>Oklahoma<br />
Elk Population: 2,200<br />
Bull/Cow Ratio: N/A<br />
Nonresidents: $306<br />
Hunter Success: N/A<br />
Highlights: Only 85 public-land permits were available this year, down from 330 last year. The largest herd and best opportunity is on the Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge. A few small herds are scattered in the northeast and southeast corners of the state with one permit available for those areas. Residents looking to pull one of these once-in-a-lifetime tags have less than a 1 percent chance. But there is no quota on private-land elk and hunting access can be had for a fee. Visit <a href="http://www.wildlifedepartment.com" target="_blank">www.wildlifedepartment.com</a>.</p>
<p>Ontario<br />
Elk Population: 700<br />
Bull/Cow Ratio: 30/100<br />
Residents only<br />
Hunter Success: N/A<br />
Highlights: Thirteen years after RMEF helped reintroduce elk to Ontario, the province will hold its first modern elk hunt this year. Between 300-775 elk reside in the Bancroft-North Hastings area in the southern end of the province where the hunt will take place. Lucky hunters now hold 24 bull tags and 46 cow tags for the late-September hunt. Visit <a href="http://www.ontario.ca/hunting" target="_blank">www.ontario.ca/hunting</a>.</p>
<p>Oregon<br />
Elk Population: 125,000 (65,000 Rocky Mountain, 60,000 Roosevelt&#8217;s)<br />
Bull/Cow Ratio: 19/100 Rocky Mountain, 13/100 Roosevelt&#8217;s<br />
Nonresidents: $141 license, $501 tag<br />
Hunter Success: 16 percent Rocky Mountain, 12 percent Roosevelt&#8217;s<br />
Highlights: Much of eastern Oregon saw record snowfall in the mountains, and biologists are hopeful that elk populations came out unscathed. Bowhunters can prowl most of the east side with only a general tag. For rifle hunters, nearly everything east of the Cascades is permit-only, save for a second-season rifle hunt in a few units of the northeast. Roosevelt&#8217;s elk tags are still over-the-counter (except for the far northwest and southwest corners), herds are strong and there are some beasts on the hoof. This season, hunters 17 and under are required to wear a hunter orange hat or vest when hunting any big game with any firearm. Visit <a href="http://www.dfw.state.or.us" target="_blank">www.dfw.state.or.us</a>.</p>
<p>Pennsylvania<br />
Elk Population: 750<br />
Bull/Cow ratio: 28/100<br />
Nonresidents: $101 license, $250 elk tag<br />
Hunter success: 80 percent<br />
Highlights: It&#8217;s been reported before and here it is again: Pennsylvania could produce a bull this year that breaks not only state but also world records. Along with antler size, elk populations and hunter opportunity are growing. With the herd up 7 percent over last year, the state is offering 10 more antlerless tags for a total of 18 bull permits and 38 antlerless. Odds for drawing remain slim (around 1/1000), but if you do pull the coveted tag, the state boasts the highest success rate in North America. And more than half of the elk live on over a million acres of public land. Visit <a href="http://www.pgc.state.pa.us" target="_blank">www.pgc.state.pa.us</a>.</p>
<p>Saskatchewan<br />
Elk Population: 16,000<br />
Bull/Cow Ratio: 20/100<br />
Residents only<br />
Hunter Success: 23 percent<br />
Highlights: It was a tough winter across much of the province, and the central and northeast areas saw high deer mortality and some elk mortality. Near the town of Hudson Bay, though, where the prairie meets the forest, managers have implemented a bulls-only season, followed by an either-sex season&#8211;all of which can be had with over-the-counter tags. In the south, elk populations are on the rise and each year seems to bring new hunting opportunities. New in 2011 are antlerless seasons in zones 21, north of Regina, and 52, south of Prince Albert. Visit <a href="http://www.environment.gov.sk.ca/hunting" target="_blank">www.environment.gov.sk.ca/hunting</a>.</p>
<p>South Dakota<br />
Elk Population: 3,200<br />
Bull/Cow Ratio: 34/100<br />
Residents only<br />
Hunter Success: 53 percent<br />
Highlights: There are several small prairie herds scattered across the state, but managers want to see the Black Hills herd grow to roughly 4,000. They aim to increase hunter opportunity in the long term, which means decreased hunter opportunity in the short term. Managers cut any-elk rifle tags by 25 to 470. Antlerless tags took an even bigger hit, dropping from 570 to 395. Visit <a href="http://www.sdgfp.info/wildlife/hunting" target="_blank">www.sdgfp.info/wildlife/hunting</a>.</p>
<p>Tennessee<br />
Elk Population: 300-400<br />
Bull/Cow Ratio: N/A<br />
Nonresidents: 1 permit to nonresidents and 1 auction tag<br />
Hunter Success: 60 percent<br />
Highlights: Tennessee&#8217;s elk population is holding steady but the ultimate goal is a herd of 2,000 animals. Managers are working to expand and improve elk range while keeping hunt permits conservative. Only four permits are available for residents. Last year, two of those hunters failed to fill their tags. Visit <a href="http://www.state.tn.us/twra/elkmain.html" target="_blank">www.state.tn.us/twra/elkmain.html</a>.</p>
<p>Utah<br />
Elk Population: 72,500<br />
Bull/Cow Ratio: N/A<br />
Nonresidents: $80 license plus $280 to $1,500 permit<br />
Hunter Success: 17 percent<br />
Highlights: Utah has produced a staggering number of record-book bulls over the past decade. The state&#8217;s largest herds are found in the Wasatch, Plateau and Fish Lake units, which should produce some serious antler growth this year on the heels of a particularly wet spring. The fact that the overall population continues to grow as well is testament to good management. The state issued 1,200 more cow tags and 1,250 more spike permits this fall. Odds are still tough for limited-entry tags. Nonresidents get 10 percent of available rifle tags. Visit <a href="http://www.wildlife.utah.gov/hunting/biggame" target="_blank">www.wildlife.utah.gov/hunting/biggame</a>.</p>
<p>Washington<br />
Elk Population: 55,000-60,000<br />
Bull/Cow Ratio: 12-20/100<br />
Nonresidents: $434 (will increase to $497 before season starts)<br />
Hunter Success: 8 percent general, 39 percent for special limited-entry permits<br />
Highlights: The state&#8217;s elk population is divided about evenly between Roosevelt&#8217;s in the west and Rocky Mountain elk to the east. In the famous Blue Mountains of southeast Washington, resident and nonresident hunters alike will find over-the-counter spike tags readily available. Highly-prized permits for branch-antlered bulls will be far tougher to come by. The Yakima herd has improved and this year the area has increased antlerless permits. In the Mount St. Helens area, managers are still trying to decrease herd numbers with more special permits for antlerless elk. Both nonresident and resident hunters should take note that elk tag fees will jump nearly 15 percent effective September 1 to help cover budget shortfalls. Visit <a href="http://www.wdfw.wa.gov/hunting" target="_blank">www.wdfw.wa.gov/hunting</a>.</p>
<p>Wyoming<br />
Elk Population: 120,000<br />
Bull/Cow Ratio: 23/100<br />
Nonresidents: $591 permit, $302 cow-calf permit, $1,071 special permit<br />
Hunter Success: 44 percent<br />
Highlights: Last year, hunters harvested 25,600 elk, up from the five-year average of 21,000. Biologists say mature bulls continue to thrive in most hunting units and the statewide population remains above management objectives. The dark exception is the state&#8217;s northwest corner. Elk numbers in the Clark&#8217;s Fork and Cody herds are still down due to predation and poor habitat. The Jackson herd that summers in Yellowstone is well off the mark, too, and managers are being conservative on tags. Roughly half the hunting units just outside the park have set quotas, one is closed and rest are limited to antlered elk only. Visit <a href="http://www.gf.state.wy.us/wildlife/hunting" target="_blank">www.gf.state.wy.us/wildlife/hunting</a>.</p>
<p>Yukon Territory<br />
Elk Population: 250-300<br />
Bull/Cow Ratio: 24/100<br />
Residents only<br />
Hunter Success: 52 percent<br />
Highlights: With two distinct herds, Takhini and Braeburn, the territory held its first elk hunt in a quarter-century in 2009, and followed it with a second hunt last year. Those hunts were overwhelmingly successful&#8211;too successful. Hunters had a 73 percent success rate on bulls and a 31 percent success rate on cows. So this year managers are offering cow-only permits to lighten the pressure on bulls while reducing overall herd numbers down to management objectives. The target bull/cow ratio for the area is 50/100. Visit <a href="http://www.environmentyukon.gov.yk.ca" target="_blank">www.environmentyukon.gov.yk.ca</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2011/08/17/rmefs-2011-elk-hunting-forecast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New RMEF Staffer to Focus on Wyo., S.D. and Neb. Habitat</title>
		<link>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2011/04/05/new-rmef-staffer-to-focus-on-wyo-s-d-and-neb-habitat/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-rmef-staffer-to-focus-on-wyo-s-d-and-neb-habitat</link>
		<comments>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2011/04/05/new-rmef-staffer-to-focus-on-wyo-s-d-and-neb-habitat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Remington</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wyoming Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation easements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habitat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeff jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land exchanges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate gifts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rocky mountain elk foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wyoming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/?p=14197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MISSOULA, Mont. &#8211; Jeff Jones of Fort Collins, Colo., is the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation&#8217;s newest lands program manager, a key position in the organization&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MISSOULA, Mont. &#8211; Jeff Jones of Fort Collins, Colo., is the <a href="http://www.rmef.org/">Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation&#8217;s</a> newest lands program manager, a key position in the organization&#8217;s work to conserve habitat for elk and other wildlife.</p>
<p>Jones will be based in Cheyenne, Wyo., to focus on RMEF land conservation initiatives in Wyoming, South Dakota and Nebraska.</p>
<p>The job involves working with private and public landowners in the area of land protection including purchased and donated conservation easements, assembled land exchanges, real estate gifts, disposal of lands and habitat management.</p>
<p>To date, RMEF has permanently protected more than 921,000 acres of habitat from loss to residential development or other land-use changes. The organization holds and monitors more than 170 conservation easements across 15 states. Most RMEF-protected lands are now publicly held and open for access including hunting.</p>
<p>Blake Henning, vice president of lands and conservation for RMEF, said, &#8220;I&#8217;m pleased to welcome Jeff to our staff because he brings a tremendous diversity of experience and education to help us accomplish our mission.&#8221;</p>
<p>Most of Jones&#8217; career has been spent developing farm- and ranch-land protection projects for the Legacy Land Trust and American Farmland Trust. He also worked for the Conservation Practitioners Fellowship developing training curricula and conducting research for land trusts. Jones holds a law degree from the University of Denver, a master&#8217;s degree from Colorado State University in natural resource management, and a bachelor&#8217;s degree from the University of Northern Colorado in political science and environmental studies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2011/04/05/new-rmef-staffer-to-focus-on-wyo-s-d-and-neb-habitat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Armed Teachers, Administrators and School Security?</title>
		<link>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2011/01/19/armed-teachers-administrators-and-school-security/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=armed-teachers-administrators-and-school-security</link>
		<comments>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2011/01/19/armed-teachers-administrators-and-school-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Remington</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guns/Gun Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concealed carry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun free zones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[handguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sen. mark christensen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/?p=13271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With &#8220;gun free&#8221; zones like schools and shopping malls, it is clear the &#8220;gun free&#8221; isn&#8217;t at all proportional to gun free violence. And yet, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With &#8220;gun free&#8221; zones like schools and shopping malls, it is clear the &#8220;gun free&#8221; isn&#8217;t at all proportional to gun free violence. And yet, still more people clamor for more restrictions on lawful citizens and the robbing of our rights.</p>
<p>Will that end anytime soon? Sen. Mark Christensen of Imperial, Nebraska has <a href="http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/bill-would-let-nebraska-teachers-carry-g">introduced a bill</a> in his state that would allow school administrators, teachers and security staff to carry concealed handguns in schools.</p>
<p>Tom Remington</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2011/01/19/armed-teachers-administrators-and-school-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RMEF Grants for Projects in Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma</title>
		<link>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2010/10/06/rmef-grants-for-projects-in-kansas-nebraska-oklahoma/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rmef-grants-for-projects-in-kansas-nebraska-oklahoma</link>
		<comments>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2010/10/06/rmef-grants-for-projects-in-kansas-nebraska-oklahoma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 16:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Remington</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rocky mountain elk foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wildlife]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/?p=12258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MISSOULA, Mont.&#8211;Wildlife conservation and youth education projects in three Great Plains states&#8211;Kansas, Nebraska and Oklahoma&#8211;have been selected to receive grants from the Rocky Mountain Elk [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MISSOULA, Mont.&#8211;Wildlife conservation and youth education projects in three Great Plains states&#8211;Kansas, Nebraska and Oklahoma&#8211;have been selected to receive grants from the <a href="http://www.rmef.org/">Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation</a> in 2010.</p>
<p>The RMEF grants, totaling $31,850, will affect three counties in Kansas, two counties in Nebraska and three counties in Oklahoma.</p>
<p>One additional project in Kansas has statewide interest.</p>
<p>&#8220;All of these grants are possible because of successful banquets and fundraisers staged over the past year by our Kansas, Nebraska and Oklahoma volunteers&#8211;most of whom are elk hunters as well as devoted conservationists,&#8221; said David Allen, RMEF president and CEO. &#8220;Since 1984, our annual grants have helped complete 165 different projects in these three states with a combined value of more than $4.7 million.&#8221;</p>
<p>RMEF grants will help fund the following projects, listed by state and county:</p>
<p>Kansas projects (grant total $13,750):</p>
<p>Riley County&#8211;Manage approximately 462 acres of agricultural plots at Fort Riley to help keep elk on federal lands and to benefit other resident species (also affects Geary County).</p>
<p>Morton County&#8211;Treat invasive tamarisk using a combination of mechanical, prescribe burn and herbicide techniques to improve habitat for elk and other wildlife at Cimarron National Grassland.</p>
<p>Statewide&#8211;Sponsor Kansas 2011 Pass It On-Outdoor Mentors program to help introduce at-risk Kansas youths to outdoor recreation and conservation.</p>
<p>Nebraska projects (grant total $10,000):</p>
<p>Dawes County&#8211;Sponsor a scholarship for one wildlife conservation student at Chadron State College for 2010.</p>
<p>Sioux County&#8211;Remove one mile of woven-wire fencing and replace with a more wildlife-friendly fencing to separate grazing units at Soldier Creek Wilderness Area.</p>
<p>Oklahoma projects (grant total $8,100):</p>
<p>Lincoln County&#8211;Sponsor CrossTimbers Archery and Adventure Camp to introduce families, kids and at-risk youths to outdoor recreation and conservation.</p>
<p>Pittsburg County&#8211;Sponsor Pittsburg County 4-H Shooting Sports Program, with more than 500 youth participants, to introduce students to outdoor recreation and conservation.</p>
<p>Pushmataha County&#8211;Prescribe burn 4,100 acres to enhance forage for elk, deer, turkey, quail, migratory songbirds and other wildlife at Pushmataha Wildlife Management Area.</p>
<p>Habitat projects are selected for grants using science-based criteria and a committee of RMEF volunteers and staff along with representatives from partnering agencies and universities. Conservation education and hunting heritage projects are selected by RMEF field staff and volunteers.</p>
<p>Partners for 2010 projects in Kansas, Nebraska and Oklahoma include Cimarron National Grassland, Fort Riley Military Reservation, Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, U.S. Forest Service, other agencies, organizations and landowners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2010/10/06/rmef-grants-for-projects-in-kansas-nebraska-oklahoma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RMEF 2010 Elk Hunting Forecast</title>
		<link>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2010/08/20/rmef-2010-elk-hunting-forecast/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rmef-2010-elk-hunting-forecast</link>
		<comments>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2010/08/20/rmef-2010-elk-hunting-forecast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Remington</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alaska Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idaho Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saskatchewan Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wyoming Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elk hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ricky mountain elk foundation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/?p=11677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MISSOULA, Mont.&#8211;Elk and elk hunting opportunities are abundant in much of North America, and the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation is offering a sneak peek at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MISSOULA, Mont.&#8211;Elk and elk hunting opportunities are abundant in much of North America, and the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation is offering a sneak peek at upcoming seasons in its annual roundup of hunt forecasts for 28 states and provinces, now posted at <a href="http://www.rmef.org">www.rmef.org</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;Generally speaking, elk populations are in great shape and hunters have much to look forward to across the West, as well as in several Midwestern and Eastern states,&#8221; said David Allen, president and CEO of the Elk Foundation. &#8220;A mild winter, much needed spring and summer moisture and our habitat conservation successes all factor into our optimism for the upcoming hunting season.&#8221;</p>
<p>This summer, RMEF passed the 5.8 million acre mark for habitat conserved or enhanced for elk and other wildlife.</p>
<p>Allen added, however, that wolves continue to be a growing concern in regions where the predators share habitat with elk and other big game herds. In some areas, elk calf survival rates are now insufficient to sustain herds for the future. The urgent need to control wolf populations is a localized wildlife management crisis now compounded by a recent court decision to return wolves to full federal protections under the Endangered Species Act. RMEF has asked Congress to intervene and grant management authority to the states.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a condensed look at elk data from state and provincial wildlife conservation agencies. To see these forecasts in their entirety, with links to respective elk regulations or other Web pages, visit www.rmef.org. For even more coverage, see the Sept./Oct. 2010 edition of the RMEF member magazine, Bugle. To join, call 800-CALL ELK.</p>
<p>Alaska<br />
·       Elk Population: Kodiak Archipelago (GMU 8), 650; Etolin (GMU 3), not available<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratios: Not available<br />
·       Nonresidents: $85 hunting license plus $300 elk tag, and must hire a guide<br />
·       Hunter Success: GMU 8, 17 percent; GMU 3, 5 percent<br />
While bulls in the lower 48 average 700 pounds, bulls in GMU 3&#8242;s South Etolin Wilderness in southeast Alaska can get up to 1,300. However, recent success rates hover at just 5 percent with an annual average of six bulls killed for the entire unit. Zarembo Island northwest of Etolin has remained closed to hunting since 2006 because of low elk numbers. For GMU 8 in southern Alaska, odds are considerably better at 17 percent. Area biologist Larry van Deale says some recent trophies would have made the record books had the hunters cared to enter them.</p>
<p>Alberta<br />
·       Elk Population: 33,000<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratio: Not available<br />
·       Nonresidents: $255, must hire a guide<br />
·       Hunter Success: Not available<br />
This province offers opportunities for fine elk hunting as herds expand east and south onto the prairies and parklands. As herds grow, managers establish more hunting opportunities&#8211;last year alone saw three new areas open to elk hunting. Some of the biggest bulls are in these new units. The northern-most units have hunts well into January, and landowners typically welcome responsible cow hunters with open arms. The best (and only) shot for a nonresident is to go through an outfitter, as they are allotted roughly 10 percent of draw tags.</p>
<p>Arizona<br />
·       Elk Population: 25,000<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratio: 34/100<br />
·       Nonresidents: $121 hunting license (nonrefundable to enter drawing) plus $595 elk permit<br />
·       Hunter Success: 30 percent<br />
Even though the state claims 25,000 elk, its mesas and arroyos could be hiding upwards of 40,000, says Brian Wakeling, Arizona&#8217;s game branch chief. They conduct elk counts in August and September, and the thick tree cover makes it tough to get accurate counts with aerial surveys. Overlooked elk means better odds for hunters. Plus, with abundant moisture this winter and little winterkill, elk herds are flourishing. Last year saw little daylight rut activity with bulls bugling only by moonlight, which held bowhunter success to around 25 percent. Logic says those big bulls that survived merely got bigger for this season. Also note the agency&#8217;s goal to get bull/cow ratios down to 25/100 to create more hunter opportunity. Translation: more bull tags.</p>
<p>Arkansas<br />
·       Elk Population: 500<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratio: 40/100<br />
·       Nonresidents: varies for private landowner tags and three auction tags<br />
·       Hunter Success: 42 percent<br />
When Arkansas held its first elk-hunting season in 1998, hunter success was close to 100 percent. Now the elk are far wilier. Out-of-state hunters have a couple options: either buy an auction tag or contact a landowner for access. For the latter, hunters must receive written permission from the landowner to hunt their private property, and can only hunt there. Available tags remain the same as last year: 29 public-land tags (8 bull, 16 antlerless, 2 either-sex youth tags, plus 3 either-sex auction tags).</p>
<p>British Columbia<br />
·       Elk Population: 50,000<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratio: 20/100<br />
·       Nonresidents: $189 hunting license plus $262.50 for elk permit. Must hire a guide.<br />
·       Hunter Success: Not available<br />
This province boasts a thriving population of Rocky Mountain elk and some of the biggest Roosevelt&#8217;s bulls in the world, says Stephen MacIver, wildlife regulations officer. However, a hunter must first hurdle the odds of drawing a limited-entry tag. The odds are roughly 35:1. However, guides are allotted a percentage of the tags. Vancouver Island and the Sunshine Coast in the far west have strong populations of Roosevelt&#8217;s. For Rocky Mountain elk, your best bet would be the Kootenay region in the southeast, which boasts the province&#8217;s highest success rates. Another good option is the agricultural zones in the Peace River region.</p>
<p>California<br />
·       Elk Population: 1,500 Rocky Mountains, 6,000 Roosevelt&#8217;s, 3,900 tules<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratios: 20/100 to 90/100<br />
·       Nonresidents: $145 hunting license (nonrefundable to enter drawing) plus $1,173 elk permit<br />
·       Hunter Success: 75 percent<br />
Conditions are ripe for a world&#8217;s record tule, says Joe Hobbs, California Fish and Game elk coordinator. On the East Park Reservoir Unit, good spring rains this year and a low harvest of old bulls last year have left the environment in top shape for antler growth. The bad news? Your odds of drawing a bull tag there are 1 in 350. On the Grizzly Island unit, odds are 1 in 1,000. Auction tags are a possibility, too, but if odds and auctions aren&#8217;t your thing, private landowners receive a limited number of tags, and some are available for sale. The Marble Mountains unit in the northwest has 35 bull tags, 10 antlerless and 5 late-season muzzleloader/archery either-sex tags.</p>
<p>Colorado<br />
·       Elk Population: 286,000<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratio: 30/100<br />
·       Nonresidents: cow $354, any elk $544<br />
·       Hunter Success: 23 percent<br />
Colorado is the land of plenty for elk and elk hunters but it isn&#8217;t currently known for producing behemoth bulls. That could be a different story this hunting season. The past two falls have been cursed with warm weather. In the northwest where many of the bigger bulls roam, elk migration didn&#8217;t even begin until after regular rifle seasons were over. Couple that with abundant spring and summer moisture producing high quality forage and the setup is perfect for more trophy bulls. The state&#8217;s more-than 200,000 elk hunters also will find that cow tags have gone up $100, the Division of Wildlife has recommended cutting 1,500 cow/either-sex rifle tags across the state, and over-the-counter archery licenses for units 54, 55 and 551 have been nixed. On the other hand, places where herds remain above objective, such as the Gunnison Basin, will see more rifle tags available.</p>
<p>Idaho<br />
·       Elk Population: 101,000<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratio: 25/100<br />
·       Nonresidents: license $155, tag $417<br />
·       Hunter Success: 20 percent<br />
Since 2007, Idaho&#8217;s elk population has fallen by 24,000. And for the second year in a row, out-of-state tag revenues in the state have mirrored that trend. Hunters list wolves, the economy and nonresident tag prices as factors. This isn&#8217;t ideal for state wildlife coffers, but it could be ideal if you&#8217;re looking for elk hunting all to yourself. Wolves have hit elk populations hard in the classic elk country of the Lolo, Sawtooth and Selway areas, and the state has capped tags. Bull/cow and cow/calf ratios are in tough shape, and the statewide population could fall below 100,000 for the first time in decades. But the declines are by no means across the board. Elk populations are at or above objectives in 22 of 29 elk hunt zones. And a mild winter boosted cow and calf elk survival rates across most of the state. The Beaverhead, Lemhi, Island Park, Teton, Snake River, Palisades and Tex Creek zones all have healthy herds and offer the kind of elk hunting Idaho is famous for.</p>
<p>Kansas<br />
·       Elk Population: 250-275<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratio: 40/100<br />
·       Nonresidents: Private landowner permits and one Commissioner&#8217;s Permit, usually sold at auction<br />
·       Hunter Success: 75 percent either sex, 50 anterless<br />
Kansas now has unlimited over-the-counter either-sex elk tags. In certain counties across the state, namely those not adjacent to Fort Riley or Cimarron National Grasslands, any resident can purchase one, hook up with a landowner and hunt elk. Landowners in Hamilton County in western Kansas voiced concern over crop depredation, and biologists responded with the liberal permits. If you care to play the odds, enter the drawing for a once-in-a-lifetime tag. More than half the state&#8217;s elk reside on and around 100,000-acre Fort Riley, which allows hunting: 12 either-sex (up 4 from last year) and 15 antlerless permits.</p>
<p>Kentucky<br />
·       Elk Population: 10,000<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratio: 35-40/100<br />
·       Nonresidents: $10 to apply, $365 for permit, $130 for hunting license<br />
·       Hunter Success: 80 percent<br />
This year, the Bluegrass State&#8217;s wapiti hunt was so in-demand that applicants from all 50 states applied, plus the District of Columbia. That&#8217;s a great vote of confidence for the East&#8217;s biggest herd, but it means the odds of drawing got even longer for nonresidents: 1:200. For Kentuckians, you&#8217;re competing against 29,000 other hunters for 720 tags&#8211;far better odds at 1:42. Permit numbers in the state have been on a rollercoaster. Last year, permits rocketed up 50 percent to 1,000 tags. Hunters had 60 percent success on cows and 91 percent on bulls. So, managers reined in the number of permits this year back to 800 in hopes of beefing up the population.</p>
<p>Manitoba<br />
·       Elk Population: 6,500<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratio: 35-45/100<br />
·       Residents only<br />
·       Hunter Success: 20 percent<br />
Elk are the &#8220;most desired species to hunt&#8221; among province residents, says Ken Rebizant, provincial big game manager. Traditional strongholds such as the Porcupine, Interlake and Duck Mountain regions are going to have elk, and big ones, but they&#8217;re tough draws, as the province has no over-the-counter tags. But, since bovine tuberculosis has impacted the Riding Mountain herd, provoking managers to reduce herd numbers, interest in that area has waned. That may be all a resident needs to finally draw an elk tag.</p>
<p>Michigan<br />
·       Elk Population: 780<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratio: 60/100<br />
·       Residents only<br />
·       Hunter Success: 70 percent<br />
For years, the state has tried to get its elk numbers down to around 800 and now it seems managers have succeeded. The tendency for elk to wreak havoc on some ag operations in the northern lower peninsula had managers working hard to reduce the herd. Now that they&#8217;ve hit their mark, Michigan will offer 230 tags, 150 less than last year. This year, the state will offer 75 any-elk tags with 155 antlerless.</p>
<p>Minnesota<br />
·       Elk Population: 170<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratio: 50/100<br />
·       Residents only<br />
·       Hunter Success: 79 percent<br />
This year, Minnesota will issue 11 once-in-a-lifetime tags for two separate seasons. Last year, 2,072 applicants put their name in for 30 permits. The state gives landowners 20 percent of the available tags. Last year, managers were able to work out a five-year management plan that calls for 30-38 elk in the Grygla herd, 20-30 animals in the Kittson Central herd and a currently undetermined number in the Caribou-Vita herd. Discussions are being held between the state DNR and Manitoba Conservation regarding population goals for the Caribou-Vita herd, which freely travels across the border.</p>
<p>Montana<br />
·       Elk Population: 150,000<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratio: 5-25/100<br />
·       Nonresidents: $593<br />
·       Hunter Success: 22 percent<br />
There are plenty of elk in many pockets of Big Sky country. In fact, Montana continues to boast the second highest elk population of any state by a margin of 30,000 animals. But some populations have plummeted in the past five years. The northern Yellowstone herd is down to 6,000 animals from 19,000 in 1996. Areas north of Yellowstone National Park have seen permits cut and over-the-counter tags change to a draw. Populations in the West Fork of the Bitterroot River and the lower Clark Fork River are 60 percent below objective with just 7 calves per 100 cows. All antlerless tags have been cut and bulls will be hard to come by. Elk populations are well below objectives throughout much of Region 1 in the northwest. Hunters will find elk widely dispersed and wary throughout their traditional ranges in the western third of the state where wolves howl. But the farther one goes east of the Continental Divide, the more elk appear. Most of the eastern portion of the state is 20 percent above population objectives.</p>
<p>Nebraska<br />
·       Elk Population: 2,400<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratio: Not available<br />
·       Residents only<br />
·       Hunter Success: 80 percent bulls, 58 percent cows<br />
The state&#8217;s elk herd is still growing consistently around 15-20 percent every year. As numbers grow, opportunities to hunt grow with them, but only if you&#8217;re a resident. This year, the state will issue 272 tags, up 40 from last year, with 98 bull and 174 cow permits. To promote strong landowner relations, one-third of those permits are available to private landowners in a drawing and are non-transferable.</p>
<p>Nevada<br />
·       Elk Population: 12,300<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratio: 32/100<br />
·       Nonresidents: $142 hunting license plus $1,200 tag<br />
·       Hunter Success: 44 percent<br />
In the past two years, the state&#8217;s elk population has grown nearly 30 percent. Opportunities for hunters to chase them have followed suit. A few hundred tags more than last year will be issued this season for a total of 3,350. Ten percent of those tags go to nonresidents who are looking at pretty decent 1:44 odds to draw a bull tag. The quality of bulls in the harvest remains high with more than 67 percent of bulls reported being six points or better. The state&#8217;s Elk Management on Private Lands Program distributed 66 tags to property owners to do with as they wish. Estimated revenue generated from those tags topped nearly $500,000 for the landowners.</p>
<p>New Mexico<br />
·       Elk Population: 75,000-95,000<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratio: 42/100<br />
·       Nonresidents: $27 nonrefundable fee to enter drawing, plus $562 standard bull tag or $787 quality bull tag<br />
·       Hunter Success: 30 percent<br />
Out-of-staters looking to hunt here will find no over-the-counter tags. Those who didn&#8217;t draw may be able to contact a landowner for one of their tags (be ready to write a hefty check). The state has no bonus or preference point system. Residents get the bulk of the tags, 78 percent. The state&#8217;s units are broken into &#8220;quality&#8221; and &#8220;opportunity&#8221; hunts. The former will get you a better chance at bigger bulls, but odds are steep. The Gila area holds around 20,000 elk.</p>
<p>North Dakota<br />
·       Elk Population: 2,000<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratio: Not available<br />
·       Nonresidents: One auction tag available<br />
·       Hunter Success: 42 percent<br />
Big news this year is the hunt inside Theodore Roosevelt National Park. With 950 elk, the park is looking to control elk populations, possibly killing 275 elk for the next five years to get the population at 100-400. For the rest of the state&#8217;s elk, things are pretty much status quo. Managers issued 561 tags&#8211;with 245 any-sex and 315 antlerless tags, the same as last year. Almost all hunting is now in the western Badlands.</p>
<p>Oklahoma<br />
·       Elk Population: 2,300<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratio: Not available<br />
·       Nonresidents: $306<br />
·       Hunter Success: Not available<br />
The Sooner State&#8217;s elk population is holding steady and the number of permits to hunt public land still hovers around 330. Odds of pulling one of those tags are dismal, less than 1 percent. But, if you do draw, there are some truly fine Okie bulls. Nonresidents looking to hunt here might do best to purchase a tag and then find a landowner who wants elk out of his winter wheat. For cow hunts, seasons are extended well into December and January.</p>
<p>Oregon<br />
·       Elk Population: 120,000<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratio: 15/100<br />
·       Nonresidents: license $140, tag $500<br />
·       Hunter Success: 13 percent<br />
Due to budget constraints, biologists aren&#8217;t exactly sure how many elk they have as aerial surveys have been limited. But they think populations are stable. And, this year, managers plan to issue nearly 1,000 more permits than last season. Rocky Mountain elk dominate the east side of the Cascades while Roosevelt&#8217;s reign to the west. Most hunting in the steep and dark west is open to all comers with over-the-counter tags, while eastern Oregon is draw-only for rifle hunters. Bowhunters can hunt most of the east side with a general tag. Those eastern elk have some new neighbors, as a couple wolf packs have dispersed into the state from Idaho.</p>
<p>Pennsylvania<br />
·       Elk Population: 700<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratio: 28/100<br />
·       Nonresidents: $250 for elk tag, $101 for general license<br />
·       Hunter Success: 94 percent bull, 73 percent cow<br />
To be blunt, this state has been growing some absolute toads. In 2006, a hunter killed a 425-2/8 non-typical, while just last year a hunter killed a 423-6/8 non-typical. Both bulls were around 6 years old. Records remain to be shattered if a bull can tack on a few extra years. Managers are currently revising the state&#8217;s elk management plan to determine how many elk that habitat and society will support. In the meantime, 51 tags will again be issued this season, with 18 bull and 33 cow.</p>
<p>Saskatchewan<br />
·       Elk Population: 15,000-16,000<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratio: 20/100<br />
·       Residents only<br />
·       Hunter Success: 20 percent<br />
Landowner tolerance for elk dictates seasons in this province. In the south where there is a lot of private farmland and the only predator carries a rifle, you&#8217;ll find ample antlerless quotas meant to get elk off the crops and into freezers. If you want a bull, this just might be your year. With so much open ag land, bulls are easy to spot. To help them gain a little antler weight, managers only allow them to be hunted every third year, which has produced some 400-inch monsters. Moose Mountain Provincial Park in the southeast corner is home to 1,400 elk and has seen numbers gaining strength in the past decade. This is a draw-only unit, open to either-sex hunting, and also has outstanding bulls.<br />
For challenging over-the-counter hunts, the north-central and western regions offer forests and meadow fringes that hide elk along with plenty of their four-legged predators.</p>
<p>South Dakota<br />
·       Elk Population: 5,000<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratio: 75/100<br />
·       Residents only<br />
·       Hunter Success: 50 percent<br />
The state&#8217;s largest herd in the Black Hills National Forest numbered as many as 5,000 animals back in 2003. Aggressive management knocked that number down to the current 3,000. But public attitudes have shifted and there is once again a cry for more elk and more hunting opportunity. To reach a goal of 4,000 in the Hills, managers have had to cut rifle tags again this year to 1,065&#8211;a drop of 300 from last year. Still, residents&#8217; odds of hunting a bull in the Black Hills are a solid 1:10. If you pull a tag, make the most of it, as you have to wait nine years to apply again.</p>
<p>Tennessee<br />
·       Elk Population: 400<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratio: Not available<br />
·       Nonresidents: $10 fee to enter drawing, $300 if drawn<br />
·       Hunter Success: 100 percent<br />
&#8220;We want to grow this elk herd and add more hunters,&#8221; says Steve Bennett, elk restoration project coordinator. The herd seems to be cooperating. Last year, five lucky hunters participated in the state&#8217;s first sanctioned elk hunt, taking five elk, four on the first day. State wildlife managers hope to see the herd reach 2,000 animals within the next two decades.</p>
<p>Utah<br />
·       Elk Population: 68,000<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratio: 15-80/100<br />
·       Nonresidents: $65 hunting license, plus $388 general tag, $795 limited-entry tag or $1,500 premium limited-entry tag<br />
·       Hunter Success: 17 percent<br />
Statewide, hunters kill bulls that average around 6½ years, and Utah has seen good moisture this past winter and spring, keeping the hills green and lush. Translation: healthy brutes with big headgear. The most popular units include San Juan and Fillmore Pahvant but odds of drawing a limited-entry tag are tough. For residents, it&#8217;s 1:16.  Nonresidents, 1:44. There are over-the-counter options, especially for archery hunters who are willing to hike into wilderness.</p>
<p>Washington<br />
·       Elk Population: 55,000-60,000<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratio: 12-20/100 in most units<br />
·       Nonresidents: $432<br />
·       Hunter Success: 8 percent<br />
Washington has more hunters per elk than any other state. Managers help control densities by making hunters choose either westside Roosevelt&#8217;s or eastside Rocky Mountain elk. Both hunters and elk are split about 50/50. Generally, herd numbers are stable this season but the Yakima herd has seen a drop in calf recruitment, thus special permits for both branch-antlered bulls and cows have been cut 30-40 percent. While it may take some time for the Yakima herd to rebound, the state has plenty of other hot spots like the classic elk country of the Blue Mountains. This area in the southeast corner has seen an increase in bull permits the last few years. The southwest also offers over-the-counter permits, especially on the Gifford Pinchot National Forest around Mt. St. Helens where managers are trying to knock down herd numbers. Wolves have established at least two confirmed packs on the eastside.</p>
<p>Wyoming<br />
·       Elk Population 120,000<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratio: 23/100<br />
·       Nonresidents: $577 for permit, $288 for cow-calf permit, $1,057 for special permit<br />
·       Hunter Success: 43 percent<br />
Certain places in Wyoming have seen significant impacts from wolves and other carnivores. Much of the Cody herd, near Yellowstone, is seeing poor calf-recruitment made worse by predation. Once a general hunting area, it is now a limited-entry draw. Areas around Jackson Hole and the Gros Ventre and Teton Wilderness Areas will see tightened seasons and antler-point restrictions to try and boost bull/cow and cow/calf ratios. Outside the northwest corner, the state&#8217;s elk populations are up 15,000 from last year and many units are far above objectives. The statewide objective is 80,000 elk. That&#8217;s 40,000 less than where the herd stands now. The state expects to have lots of leftover antlerless licenses. Aggressive seasons have been set in many places including the Snowy Range, Laramie Peak and Sierra Madre. Last year, the state shifted to a first-come/first-served online licensing system. Out-of-staters can now search for leftover licenses without having to wait in line (in Wyoming) for reduced and full-price tags. For those more interested in hunting bulls, the state allots 16 percent of its limited quota and general licenses to nonresidents.</p>
<p>Yukon Territory<br />
·       Elk Population: 250-300<br />
·       Bull/Cow Ratio: 60/100<br />
·       Residents only<br />
·       Hunter Success: 29 percent<br />
This province, which boasts 70,000 moose and only 35,000 people, last year held its first official elk hunt in 25 years. Twenty-six hunters took an elk home for the freezer. While much of the Yukon&#8217;s northern boreal forest can&#8217;t support elk, the Takhini Valley to the<br />
south along the Alaska highway, and Braeburn to the north along the Klondike Highway, are elk strongholds. A total of 63 permits will be distributed by lottery for Takhini. Up in Braeburn, six permits are available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2010/08/20/rmef-2010-elk-hunting-forecast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Possible Nebraska Record Buck</title>
		<link>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2009/11/24/a-possible-nebraska-record-buck/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-possible-nebraska-record-buck</link>
		<comments>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2009/11/24/a-possible-nebraska-record-buck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Remington</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deer Hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antlers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boone and crockett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[record trophy buck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wes o'brien]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/?p=8425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See a photo and read the story from the Journal Star. Hat tip to reader &#8220;jes&#8221; for the lead. Tom Remington]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See a photo and read the story from the <a href="http://journalstar.com/news/state-and-regional/nebraska/article_7598f1a0-d4a5-11de-babb-001cc4c03286.html">Journal Star</a>.</p>
<p>Hat tip to reader &#8220;jes&#8221; for the lead.</p>
<p>Tom Remington</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2009/11/24/a-possible-nebraska-record-buck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elk Foundation Grants for Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma</title>
		<link>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2009/10/22/elk-foundation-grants-for-kansas-nebraska-oklahoma/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=elk-foundation-grants-for-kansas-nebraska-oklahoma</link>
		<comments>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2009/10/22/elk-foundation-grants-for-kansas-nebraska-oklahoma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Remington</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kansas Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma Hunting News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fund raising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rocky mountain elk foundation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/?p=8136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MISSOULA, Mont.? Elk and other wildlife in the nation?s breadbasket will benefit from $31,343 in new grants from the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation. The grants [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MISSOULA, Mont.? Elk and other wildlife in the nation?s breadbasket will benefit from $31,343 in new grants from the <a href="http://www.rmef.org">Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation</a>. The grants will help fund conservation and education initiatives in Kansas, Nebraska and Oklahoma.</p>
<p>Grant amounts are based on RMEF fundraisers held in the respective states.</p>
<p>?Elk Foundation volunteers drove the 2008 banquets, auctions and other fundraising events that made these grants possible. This is where their work begins to transform into on-the-ground conservation benefits, and it?s part of the payday for our supporters who are passionate about giving something back to the outdoors,? said David Allen, Elk Foundation president and CEO.</p>
<p>RMEF grants will help fund the following projects, listed by state:</p>
<p>Kansas &#8211; ?Received RMEF 2009 grants totaling $15,250. Projects include reducing depredation on private land by managing about 200 forage plots covering 750 acres for elk and other wildlife at Fort Riley military reservation in Riley County; enhancing riparian habitat by treating noxious weeds and planting cottonwood, willow and native shrubs on 777 acres at Cimarron National Grasslands in Morton County; and sponsoring Becoming an Outdoors-Woman workshops statewide, Big Brothers Big Sisters Pass It On Outdoor Mentors programs statewide, and Ninnescah Valley Archery Club youth education programs in Pratt County. RMEF partners include the Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks and other conservation groups.</p>
<p>Nebraska &#8211; ?Received RMEF 2009 grants totaling $8,075. Projects include developing methodology for aerial elk surveys in the western panhandle of Nebraska including Dawes and Box Butte counties; and funding two scholarships for wildlife conservation students at Chadron State College. RMEF partners include the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission.</p>
<p>Oklahoma? &#8211; Received RMEF 2009 grants totaling $8,018. Projects include creating forage openings for elk, rejuvenating water impoundments and maintaining firebreaks at Spavinaw Wildlife Management Area in Delaware and Mayes counties; and enhancing forage for elk and other wildlife by prescribe burning 8,195 acres at Pushmataha Wildlife Management Area in Pushmataha County. RMEF partners include the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation and other conservation groups.</p>
<p>Since 1984 in these three states, the Elk Foundation and its partners have completed 155 conservation and education projects with a value of more than $9.8 million. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2009/10/22/elk-foundation-grants-for-kansas-nebraska-oklahoma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Are We Becoming?</title>
		<link>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2006/08/23/what-are-we-becoming/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-are-we-becoming</link>
		<comments>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2006/08/23/what-are-we-becoming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Remington</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guns/Gun Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska Hunting News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/?p=926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Below are some excerpts taken from an article written today in the Fremont Tribune out of Nebraska. You read the quotes then go read the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Below are some excerpts taken from <a target="_blank" href="http://www.fremontneb.com/articles/2006/08/22/ap-state-ne/d8jlh1k02.txt">an article</a> written today in the Fremont Tribune out of Nebraska. You read the quotes then go read the article if you choose to verify I&#8217;m not taking anything out of context. Then answer the above question &#8211; &#8220;What are we becoming&#8221;.</p>
<blockquote><p><span class="story-detail">A new state law that allows concealed weapons says people can&#8217;t get permits for them if they have been convicted of a felony or violent crimes, found in the previous 10 years to be mentally ill or dangerous or judged mentally incompetent.</span></p></blockquote>
<p>Okay that sounds somewhat reasonable.</p>
<blockquote><p><span class="story-detail">Lincoln already has an ordinance barring gun possession by people who have been convicted of stalking, resisting arrest or violating a protection order.</span></p>
<p>On Monday the council added to the list people who have been convicted of assault, drug crimes, unlawful intrusion, domestic assault or public indecency.</p></blockquote>
<p>It gets better&#8230;. er, uh, worse!</p>
<blockquote><p><span class="story-detail">Concealed weapons will not be allowed in a variety of places, including bars, police stations, public meetings, athletic events, schools, churches, hospitals and banks. Signs also could be posted prohibiting the carrying of concealed weapons in other locations.</span></p></blockquote>
<p>And what the state doesn&#8217;t want to regulate they are happy to pass the authority on to the cities and towns.</p>
<blockquote><p><span class="story-detail">The state law also allows cities to bar concealed weapons or add further restrictions, and some cities have already taken action.</span></p>
<p>In Omaha, the City Council overrode Mayor Mike Fahey&#8217;s veto of a new ordinance that reverses the city&#8217;s longtime ban on concealed weapons.</p>
<p>The Kearney City Council has scheduled a public hearing for Tuesday to gauge public opinion on retaining the city&#8217;s ban on concealed weapons.</p>
<p>A Columbus City Council committee last week voted to retain the city&#8217;s ordinance barring concealed weapons.</p>
<p>Last month the Lincoln council rejected Mayor Coleen Seng&#8217;s proposal for an outright ban on concealed weapons.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, no point in stopping there.</p>
<blockquote><p><span class="story-detail">The new state law bans concealed weapons in government buildings that contain courthouses or city hall meetings. Lincoln expanded that to include weapons in plain view, in effect answering an issue raised by a gun-rights advocate who brought an unconcealed loaded pistol to a Lincoln City Council meeting.</span></p></blockquote>
<p>And just in case you were wondering&#8230;..</p>
<blockquote><p><span class="story-detail">As described in the new ordinance, a dangerous weapon is any firearm, stun gun, knife more than 3 inches long, switchblade, air gun or any other device that, if used with such intent, &#8220;cause death or bodily injury&#8221; or could inflict &#8220;cutting, stabbing or tearing wounds.&#8221;</span></p></blockquote>
<p>Tom Remington</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2006/08/23/what-are-we-becoming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nebraska Looking at Jack Rabbits</title>
		<link>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2006/01/23/nebraska-looking-at-jack-rabbits/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=nebraska-looking-at-jack-rabbits</link>
		<comments>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2006/01/23/nebraska-looking-at-jack-rabbits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Remington</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nebraska Hunting News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Nebraska Game and Parks Commission is sending its biologists into the wild to see if there is any substance to the claim that there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bText">The Nebraska Game and Parks Commission is sending its biologists into the wild to see if there is any substance to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/articles/2006/01/23/news/nebraska/c6820eb84c6138e2862570ff001708a0.txt">the claim</a> that there are too few jack rabbits and hunting of them needs to stop.</p>
<p>The Wachiska Audubon Society of Southeast Nebraska told the Game and Parks people that according to their observers, no rabbits are being found in certain areas.</p>
<p>Jack rabbits are hunted in Nebraska and annually about 1000 rabbits are taken. Officials say that statistic could be used on either side of an arguement to stop hunting the rabbits. Some could say taking 1000 rabbits is too many and others say that if you stopped hunting them, 1000 rabbits would be so insignificant it wouldn&#8217;t matter.</p>
<p>A decision will probably be reached sometime in the summer.</p>
<p>Tom Remington</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2006/01/23/nebraska-looking-at-jack-rabbits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

