
I would hate to think that on September 13 this year I would hear high-powered rifles going off around my favorite bowhunting stand…but that may the direction that the NCWRC is moving in the next few years.
In response to the proposed changes of a any-weapons season across the state, I will state my stand on the issue. I do not have so much a problem with extending out the mountain hunting season district to match up with the central hunting season…but I would not like to see the central and mountain districts both move to match the eastern hunting season schedule (basically takes away 3 weeks of bow season and replaces it with rifle season). A longer mountain deer hunting season would help ease some deer density issues that the region is experiencing.
The bigger issue – any weapon legal on private lands from September “archery” opener until January 1. I absolutely oppose the proposal.
First, we have primitive weapons seasons for a reason…it is tradition, many hunters live for that time of year, enables archery hunters to pursue un-pressured deer, generates revenue for many sporting goods stores and archery stores. These businesses would take a huge hit if exclusive archery seasons were eliminated.
Second, deer harvest will not increase for many reasons. Hunters are going to still kill their 2 or 3 deer (often 2 or 3 immature bucks) and be done for the year – it will just happen 2 months earlier in the calendar year. They won’t kill a deer or two more per year just because they can carry a gun for 2 additional months.
Third, during the rut, which is usually the peak of harvest because deer are most vulnerable, hunting will be extremely difficult because deer have been pressured for 2 months already, causing an overall drop in harvests.
Fourth, the age structure of the buck population will be altered. Instead of archery hunters taking their fair share of mature bucks, then gun/muzzleloader hunters following up with 2 or 3 weeks of high ‘trophy’ kill rate, the first week or two of September hunting season will be when most of the mature bucks will be killed. After 2 months of hunting pressure, mature does and bucks will be very difficult creatures to kill – even with the rut in full swing. This could go so far as to alter breeding behavior.
Instead of the proposed changes, the NCWRC should change the bag limit of eastern counties to 2 buck, 4 does for starters. Additionally, changing the way hunters can use their tags will produce the greatest increase in overall deer harvest. One option would be to require hunters to Earn-A-Buck tag by shooting an antlerless doe. Another option would be to adopt a system like Maryland has in some counties. I might be a little off on this, but you can shoot a buck before an antlerless harvest, but then require 2 more does to be tagged to receive your second buck tag. Another avenue to increasing deer harvest is to increase hunter numbers…aggressively attack hunter recruitment by any number of state-sponsored and non-profit programs. Any of those 4 choices would increase overall harvest and help reduce some of North Carolina’s deer density problems.
I could list some more reasons that I am opposed to the proposed regulations, but I’ll leave it at that. This process, if it continues, will be one of the most heated debates in recent history between hunters and the NCWRC, but time will tell…
If you have an opinion on this controversial topic, please drop me a comment. I know that some of my opinions are just that…opinions, but I feel rather strongly about several of the points that I made and believe the NCWRC would be making a mistake to adopt such a season structure.



Pingback: North Carolina deer season proposed changes - The Outdoor Smorgasbord - Everything Outdoors