It’s a trend that’s been going on, quietly it seems, for quite some time. Lead ammunition is becoming an issue, and will likely be phased out on a very large scale.
Waterfowlers were probably some of the first to see it, when lead shot for ducks and geese was banned over 20 years ago. Despite the uproar caused by the proposal, and pessimistic predictions that waterfowling participation would dry up due to the excessive cost of non-lead ammo, the ban passed and duck hunters bucked up and kept on hunting.
Shooting ranges have also been under the microscope, since lead ammo creates several toxicity risks…from the accumulation of lead in the ground downrange, to lead particulates and toxic gases released whenever a firearm is discharged. Manufacturers have been racing to come up with acceptable replacements for lead. The U.S. military and several law enforcement agencies have adopted “green” ammunition for range firing, and the trend is moving into the sport shooters. Sweden is anticipated to have completely banned lead ammunition by 2008, and much of Europe is not far behind.
The issue is coming to a head in California, as state lawmakers are poised to make a decision on the future of lead ammunition for the state’s big game hunters. On the table are essentially four possibilities: ban lead ammunition statewide, ban lead ammo in the current condor range, ban lead in the historic condor range (much larger area), or not to ban lead at all.
While the majority of hunters would support that fourth option, many environmentalists, some biologists, and even some hunters are arguing for the total ban of lead. From the way things are shaping up in the issue, it’s much more likely that we’ll see something in the middle.
As I reported here earlier, Tejon Ranch announced earlier this year that hunters there would have to use completely lead-free ammunition beginning with the 2008 hunting season. The restriction there goes beyond the CA Fish and Game Commission’s recommendations by also including all shotshells and rimfire ammunition.
Deedy Bryson is a hunting guide and operator of the Bryson Hesperia Resort, and does a good bit of hunting in and around Fort Hunter Liggett (a military base that is often open to the public for hunting). Deedy said her sources are indicating that Fort Hunter Ligget is also considering a ban on lead ammunition, at least for big game hunting.
From where I’m sitting, it looks like the lead ban is coming, in one form or another. Odds are that once it’s put into place, it’s not going away either. In fact, there’s a strong likelihood that this is the beginning of a national trend.
What does it mean to hunters?
Well, it means that we won’t be able to hunt with much of the ammunition we’ve become so familiar with. The Core-Lokt, PowerPoint, and other basic stuff will become history, much as lead shotshells did for waterfowl hunters. The big question mark for most hunters then, is what will replace lead ammo, and will we be able to afford it?
Replacements are a little scarce right now. Unlike shot manufacture, where tolerances are a little more flexible, rifle bullets require fairly precise balance and mass. This is why lead was such a great material for making bullets. Materials like Bismuth and “Hevi-shot” work fine for casting small pellets, but are much more difficult to work with in making bullets. Tungsten has been used by the military, but they are now finding that tungsten bullets have their own pollution issues.
Barnes, a bullet manufacturer out of Utah has been making all-copper bullets for several years now. Despite some early issues with barrel fouling, they have created several new bullets that meet the lead-free designation and offer superior performance for big game hunting. Unfortunately for many hunters who are on a budget, the Barnes bullets aren’t cheap. For handloaders, a box of TSX bullets will run close to the cost of a box of factory loaded lead ammunition. Factory ammunition with the Barnes bullets is as much as two to four times the cost of basic lead ammo ($19.99 for 30-06 Remington Core-lokt vs. $37.99 for Federal’s “Vital-Shok” loaded with Barnes TSX bullets on Cabelas website).
Until recently, Barnes has been the only real player in the non-lead field. However, based on a press release I got yesterday, Winchester ammunition has partnered with well known bullet manufacturer, Nosler, to release their new “ETipT”, non-lead bullet. Currently only available in .30 caliber loadings (.308, 30-06, 300WinMag, and .300WSM), this entry should herald the offerings from other makers as the lead ammo ban goes from distant rumor to imminent fact.
No word yet on the price range for the Winchester/Nosler ammo.
Personally, while I’m got a lot of issues with the argument that this is all about saving the condors, I do agree that getting rid of lead is probably a good idea. It’s hard on the groundwater at shooting ranges and even in some major hunting areas. It’s a threat to anyone who breathes the fumes along any shooting range, especially indoor ranges.
It’s also tough on any animal that eats it, including us. And anyone who eats any amount of game is ingesting a share of lead. It’s been removed from almost every other aspect of our lives, at least in ingestible/inhalable forms. Maybe it is about time that we remove it from our game and wild lands.